首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina >Comparative Study of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) between Different Types of Orthodontic Treatment
【2h】

Comparative Study of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) between Different Types of Orthodontic Treatment

机译:不同类型正畸治疗之间口腔健康相关质量(OHRQL)的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and objectives: Although the main objective of any orthodontic treatment is to correct malocclusion, a range of psychosocial and/or esthetic factors drive patients to undergo orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to analyze variations in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) levels in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment by means of four types of appliances: fixed buccal metal brackets, fixed buccal esthetic/ceramic brackets, fixed lingual brackets, and clear aligners. Material and Methods: The study sample comprised 120 patients aged 18 to 68 years who attended the Orthodontic department at the Dental Clinic of the University of Valencia. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was used to measure orthodontic treatment need. Each patient completed three different intervals of the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): before treatment (T0); six months after placing the orthodontic appliances (T1) and at the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Results: All groups suffered a reduction in quality of life from T0 to T1 except the metal bracket group which presented the same level for the functional limitation domain (p = 1.000), the lingual bracket group for the psychological discomfort domain (p = 1.000) and clear aligner group for the physical disability domain (p = 0.118) and psychological disability domain (p = 1.000). Nevertheless, quality of life for most domains was similar in all groups at the end of treatment (T2). Conclusions: Patients underwent a significant reduction in quality of life during treatment in comparison with their pre-treatment condition but showed significant improvements at the end of treatment.
机译:背景和目标:尽管任何正畸治疗的主要目标是正确咬合不正,范围的心理和/或美学因素驱动患者接受正牙治疗。本研究的目的是分析在生命的口腔健康相关的质量变化的患者(OHRQL)水平通过四种类型的设备中的装置进行正畸治疗:固定颊金属支架,固定颊美学/陶瓷支架,固定舌括号,并明确对准。材料和方法:研究样本包括120周年龄18〜68岁谁参加了在瓦伦西亚大学的牙科诊所口腔正畸科的病人。正畸治疗需要的指数(IOTN)是用来衡量正畸治疗需要。每个病人完成了14项口腔健康影响量表的三个不同的时间间隔(OHIP-14):治疗前(T0); 6个月放置正畸矫正器(T1)之后,并在正畸治疗(T2)的端部。结果:所有组遭受在从T0的生活质量的降低到T1除了其中介绍的功能限制域(p值= 1.000),为心理不适域舌托架组相同的水平上的金属托架组(p = 1.000)和用于身体残疾域(p = 0.118)和心理残疾域(p值= 1.000)明显的对准器组。然而,对于大多数领域的生活质量是在治疗结束时(T2)的所有组相似。结论:患者在与他们的前处理条件比较治疗期间经历的生活质量显著减少,但显示了在治疗结束显著的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号