首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease
【2h】

Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer’s Disease

机译:Alzheimer疾病中活性团体音乐干预与团体音乐的比较疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Music interventions are promising therapies for the management of symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Globally, music interventions can be classified as active or receptive depending on the participation of the subjects. Active and receptive music tasks engage different brain areas that might result in distinctive clinical effects. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of two types of music interventions and a control activity. Methods: Ninety AD patients from six nursing homes participated in the study. Nursing homes were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either active music intervention, receptive music intervention, or the usual care. Effects on cognition, behaviour, daily living activities, and motor function were assessed. Results: Active music intervention improved cognition, behaviour, and functional state in a higher extent than both receptive music intervention and usual care. The effect size of active music intervention for cognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms was large (η2 = 0.62 and 0.61, respectively), while for functional state, it was small-to-medium sized (η2 = 0.18). Receptive music intervention had a stabilizing effect on behavioural symptoms compared to control intervention (mean change from baseline ± standard deviation = −0.76 ± 3.66 and 3.35 ± 3.29, respectively). In the active music intervention, the percentage of patients who showed improvement in cognitive deficits (85.7), behavioural symptoms (92.9), and functional state (46.4) was higher than in both receptive listening (11.8, 42.9, and 14.3, respectively) and control group (6.3, 12.2, and 17.1, respectively). Conclusions: Active music intervention is useful to improve symptoms of AD and should be prescribed as a complement to the usual treatment.
机译:背景:音乐干预是在阿尔茨海默病(广告)中管理症状的疗法。在全球范围内,根据受试者的参与,音乐干预可以被分类为主动或接受。主动和接受的音乐任务与不同的大脑区域接触可能导致鲜明的临床效果。本研究旨在比较两种类型的音乐干预和对照活动的临床影响。方法:来自六名护理家庭的九十广告患者参加了该研究。养老院被随机呼吁分配,以获得有源音乐干预,接受音乐干预或通常的护理。评估了对认知,行为,日常生活和运动功能的影响。结果:主动音乐干预在更高的程度上提高了认知,行为和功能状态,而不是接受音乐干预和通常的护理。用于认知缺陷和行为症状的活动音乐干预的效果大小(分别为η2= 0.62和0.61),而对于功能状态,它是小于介质的(η2= 0.18)。与控制干预相比,接受音乐干预对行为症状的稳定性效果(从基线±标准差= -0.76±3.66和3.35±3.29分别)。在活跃的音乐干预中,表现出认知缺陷(85.7),行为症状(92.9)和功能状态(46.4)的患者的百分比高于接受听力(11.8,42.9和14.3)和对照组(分别为6.3,12.2和17.1)。结论:活跃的音乐干预可用于改善广告的症状,应作为通常治疗的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号