首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies
【2h】

Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies

机译:完全闭合冷侧缩凝结与热塑性技术:对微型CT研究的系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To prevent re-infection and provide a hermetic seal of the root canal system, an endodontist must aim to produce a void-free obturation. This review aimed to compare the completeness of root canal obturation between the two most prevalent methods—cold lateral condensation and warm gutta-percha techniques—using micro-CT (PROSPERO reg no. 249815). Materials and Methods: A search of Scopus, Embase, PubMed (Medline via PubMed), and Web of Science databases was done without any time restriction according to the PRISMA protocol. Articles that compared both techniques and were published in English were included. Data was extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using an adapted tool based on previous studies. Results: A total of 141 studies were identified by the search. Following the screening and selection of articles, 9 studies were included for review. Data was extracted manually and tabulated. Most studies had a moderate risk of bias. None determined operator skill in both methods before comparison. The data extracted from the included studies suggests that both techniques produce voids in the obturation. The thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques may result in fewer voids compared to cold lateral condensation. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the included studies, it was concluded that neither technique could completely obturate the root canal. Thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques showed better outcomes despite a possible learning bias in favor of cold lateral condensation. Establishing operator skills before comparison may help reduce this bias.
机译:为了防止重新感染并提供根管系统的气密密封,外侧主义者必须旨在产生无空隙的溶血。该审查旨在比较根管闭合在两个最普遍的方法 - 冷横向凝结和温暖的Gutta-Percha技术之间的完整性 - 使用Micro-CT(Prospero Reg No.249815)。材料和方法:搜索Scopus,Embase,Pubmed(Medline Via Pubmed),以及科学数据库的Web没有根据Prisma协议的任何时间限制完成。将两种技术与英语发布的文章。提取数据并使用基于先前研究的适应工具评估偏差的风险。结果:搜索共识别了141项研究。在筛选和选择文章之后,包括9项研究进行审查。手动提取数据并列为列表。大多数研究具有适度的偏见风险。在比较之前,两种方法都没有确定的操作员技能。从附录的研究中提取的数据表明,两种技术在困难中产生空隙。与冷横向缩合相比,热塑性化的Gutta-PERCHA技术可能导致更少的空隙。结论:考虑到包括研究的局限性,得出结论,这两种技术可以完全溶解根管。尽管可能的学习偏差有利于冷侧凝结,但热塑性化的Gutta-Percha技术表现出更好的结果。在比较之前建立操作员技能可能有助于减少这种偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号