首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Oncology >The Usefulness of Spectral Mammography in Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer Treatment—Analysis of 999 Patients with Primary Operable Breast Cancer
【2h】

The Usefulness of Spectral Mammography in Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer Treatment—Analysis of 999 Patients with Primary Operable Breast Cancer

机译:乳腺癌乳腺癌外科治疗乳腺癌治疗分析的有用性 - 初级可操作乳腺癌患者分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a promising, digital breast imaging method for planning surgeries. The study aimed at comparing digital mammography (MG) with CESM as predictive factors in visualizing multifocal-multicentric cancers (MFMCC) before determining the surgery extent. We analyzed 999 patients after breast cancer surgery to compare MG and CESM in terms of detecting MFMCC. Moreover, these procedures were assessed for their conformity with postoperative histopathology (HP), calculating their sensitivity and specificity. The question was which histopathological types of breast cancer were more frequently characterized by multifocality–multicentrality in comparable techniques as regards the general number of HP-identified cancers. The analysis involved the frequency of post-CESM changes in the extent of planned surgeries. In the present study, MG revealed 48 (4.80%) while CESM 170 (17.02%) MFMCC lesions, subsequently confirmed in HP. MG had MFMCC detecting sensitivity of 38.51%, specificity 99.01%, PPV (positive predictive value) 85.71%, and NPV (negative predictive value) 84.52%. The respective values for CESM were 87.63%, 94.90%, 80.57% and 96.95%. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were found between lobular and NST cancers (27.78% vs. 21.24%) regarding MFMCC. A treatment change was required by 20.00% of the patients from breast-conserving to mastectomy, upon visualizing MFMCC in CESM. In conclusion, mammography offers insufficient diagnostic sensitivity for detecting additional cancer foci. The high diagnostic sensitivity of CESM effectively assesses breast cancer multifocality/multicentrality and significantly changes the extent of planned surgeries. The multifocality/multicentrality concerned carcinoma, lobular and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) cancers with similar incidence rates, which requires further confirmation.
机译:对比度增强的光谱乳房X线摄影(CESM)是用于规划手术的有希望的数字乳房成像方法。该研究旨在将数字乳腺X线摄影(MG)与CESM进行比较,以在确定手术程度之前在可视化多焦 - 多中心癌症(MFMCC)之前的预测因素。我们分析了999名乳腺癌手术患者,以比较MG和CESM检测MFMCC。此外,这些程序被评估了它们与术后组织病理学(HP)的符合性,计算它们的敏感性和特异性。问题是,在相当的技术中,通过多致技术更常见的是乳腺癌的组织病理学类型的特征在于,关于总量的HP鉴定的癌症。分析涉及CESM后切CESM的频率在计划的手术程度上变化。在本研究中,MG显示48(4.80%),而CESM 170(17.02%)MFMCC病变随后在HP中证实。 MG具有MFMCC检测灵敏度为38.51%,特异性99.01%,PPV(阳性预测值)85.71%,NPV(负预测值)84.52%。 CESM的各自值为87.63%,94.90%,80.57%和96.95%。此外,在小叶和NST癌症之间没有发现统计学上显着的差异(27.78%vs.24%)关于MFMCC。通过在CESM中可视化MFMCC时,将患有乳房缓解至乳房切除术的患者需要治疗的患者。总之,乳房X线摄影为检测额外的癌症病灶提供不充分的诊断敏感性。 CESM的高诊断敏感性有效评估乳腺癌多期性/多期性,并显着改变了计划的手术程度。多期性/多期性癌症,小叶和侵入性癌的NO特殊类型(NST)癌具有相似的发病率,需要进一步确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号