首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology >Flow Diverters for Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Dangerous and Not Yet an Alternative for Conventional Endovascular Techniques
【2h】

Flow Diverters for Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Dangerous and Not Yet an Alternative for Conventional Endovascular Techniques

机译:用于未破裂的内部颈动脉瘤的流动分流器:危险且尚未成为常规血管内技术的替代方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With interest, we read the article of Lanzino et al1 about the use of flow diverters for proximal internal carotid artery aneurysms in 21 patients. There was a higher rate of complete occlusion at follow-up with flow diverters than in a matched series of aneurysms treated with conventional techniques (coiling, stent placement, ICA occlusion). Most important, there were no complications leading to permanent neurologic deficits or death, though 1 patient was found to have a complete ICA occlusion at 6 months without symptoms. The message in the article is that although longer follow-up is needed, flow diverters are probably better than conventional techniques for these ICA aneurysms because of a higher complete occlusion rate at follow-up.
机译:有兴趣,我们阅读了Lanzino等人的文章,了解21例患者近端内部颈动脉瘤的流动分流器。随着流动分流器的跟踪,比以常规技术(卷绕,支架放置,ICA闭塞)的匹配系列动脉瘤的随访,在随访时,在随访中具有更高的完全闭塞率。最重要的是,没有任何并发​​症导致永久性神经系统缺陷或死亡,尽管发现1例患者在6个月内没有症状在6个月内有完整的ICA闭塞。文章中的消息是,尽管需要更长的随访,但由于随访中的完整遮挡率更高,流量分流器可能比这些ICA动脉瘤的传统技术更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号