首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Endocrine Society >The Influence of Incidental Detection of Thyroid Nodule on Thyroid Cancer Risk and Prognosis - a Systematic Review
【2h】

The Influence of Incidental Detection of Thyroid Nodule on Thyroid Cancer Risk and Prognosis - a Systematic Review

机译:甲状腺结节偶然检测对甲状腺癌风险和预后的影响 - 系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinically unapparent thyroid nodules discovered serendipitously on imaging for non-thyroid indications are termed ‘thyroid incidentalomas’. The increase in the detection of these incidentalomas (which are known to be very common) has been attributed to the widespread use of diagnostic imaging and the increase in sensitivity and resolution of these modalities. It is unclear whether these incidentalomas have a lower prevalence of thyroid cancer or slower tumour progression compared to symptomatic thyroid nodules. This systematic review aimed to determine the risk of malignancy in incidentally detected thyroid nodules and its impact on prognosis in patients with thyroid cancer. PubMed and MEDLINE® on Web of Science databases were searched from inception to March 2020 for English language articles reporting on human studies of thyroid cancer risk and/or prognosis in incidental and non-incidental nodules. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Seventeen observational studies published between 1998 and 2018 were eligible for analysis; 4 studies reported on risk, 8 studies on prognosis and 5 studies on both risk and prognosis. In the risk review, the odds ratios calculated from the six case-control studies (3246 patients) ranged from 0.64 to 2.86 whilst the relative risks calculated from the three cohort studies (489 patients) ranged from 0.13 to 6.27. NOS score for included risk studies (n=9) ranged from 22.2% to 66.7%. A meta-analysis of the eligible case-control studies (n=3) showed a non-significant summated odds ratio of 1.04 (95% CI=0.63-1.70, p=0.88). In the prognosis review of thirteen studies, three direct and thirteen indirect markers of prognosis were compared between the incidental (1923 patients) and non-incidental (2639 patients) groups. NOS score for included prognosis studies ranged from 66.7% to 100%. Incidentally detected thyroid nodules were significantly more likely to be smaller, have lower rates of extra-thyroidal and extra-nodal extension and lymph node metastasis, and interestingly more likely to have advanced disease. Other indirect prognostic markers were not shown to be significantly different between the two groups. A meta-analysis was not possible but incidentally detected thyroid cancer had better progression-free and overall survival; this finding may be affected by ‘lead time’ bias. Current evidence suggests that the investigation and management of thyroid nodules should not be influenced by the mode of detection.
机译:临床上发现的甲状腺结节,偶然发现了非甲状腺指示的成像是称为“甲状腺Incidentalomas”。这些离药的检测的增加已经归因于诊断成像的广泛使用以及这些方式的敏感性和分辨率的增加。目前尚不清楚这些离子癌是否与症状甲状腺结节相比具有较低的甲状腺癌或较慢的肿瘤进展的患病率。这种系统审查旨在确定偶然检测到甲状腺结节中恶性肿瘤的风险及其对甲状腺癌患者预后的影响。从20024年3月2020年搜索了PubMed和Medline®,以获得关于甲状腺癌症风险和/或预后在偶然和非偶然结节中的人类研究的英语语言文章。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模(NOS)评估包括研究的质量。 1998年至2018年间发布的十七项观察研究有资格进行分析; 4项研究报告了风险,8项关于预后的研究和5项关于风险和预后的研究。在风险审查中,根据六种病例对照研究(3246名患者)计算的差距为0.64至2.86,而来自三个队列研究(489名患者)计算的相对风险范围为0.13至6.27。包含风险研究的NOS分数(n = 9)的范围从22.2%到66.7%。符合条件的患者对照研究(n = 3)的荟萃分析显示出非显着的总结大率为1.04(95%CI = 0.63-1.70,p = 0.88)。在13项研究的预后审查中,在偶然(1923名患者)和非偶事(2639名患者)组之间比较了三种直接和13个间接标志物。包括预后研究的NOS分数范围从66.7%到100%。偶然检测到的甲状腺结节显着更容易更小,具有较低的超甲状腺和卵形延伸和淋巴结转移,有趣的是更容易具有晚期疾病。其他间接预后标志物未显示在两组之间具有显着差异。 Meta分析是不可能的,但偶然检测到的甲状腺癌具有更好的无进展和整体存活;这一发现可能受到“提前期”偏见的影响。目前的证据表明甲状腺结节的调查和管理不受检测方式的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号