首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Differences in Bacterial Colonization and Biofilm Formation Property of Uropathogens between the Two most Commonly used Indwelling Urinary Catheters
【2h】

Differences in Bacterial Colonization and Biofilm Formation Property of Uropathogens between the Two most Commonly used Indwelling Urinary Catheters

机译:两种最常用的留置导尿管之间细菌定植和尿致病菌生物膜形成特性的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionCatheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) are one of the most common cause of nosocomial infections. Many bacterial species show biofilm production, which provides survival benefit to them by providing protection from environmental stresses and causing decreased susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Two most common types of catheters used in our setup are pure silicone catheter and silicone coated latex catheter. The advantage of pure silicone catheter for long term catheterization is well established. But there is still a controversy about any advantage of the silicone catheter regarding bacterial colonization rates and their biofilm production property.
机译:导言导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)是医院感染的最常见原因之一。许多细菌物种都表现出生物膜的产生,通过提供保护免受环境压力并降低对抗菌剂的敏感性,从而为它们提供了生存优势。我们的装置中使用的两种最常见的导管类型是纯硅胶导管和硅胶涂层乳胶导管。完全确定了纯硅酮导管长期插管的优势。但是,关于细菌定植速率及其生物膜生产特性,硅胶导管的任何优势仍然存在争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号