首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Methodological Aspects of Randomized Controlled Trials for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and How a Decision Support System Could Overcome Barriers
【2h】

Methodological Aspects of Randomized Controlled Trials for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and How a Decision Support System Could Overcome Barriers

机译:用于耳鸣随机对照试验的方法论:系统审查以及决策支持系统如何克服障碍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although a wide range of tinnitus management interventions is currently under research and a variety of therapeutic interventions have already been applied in clinical practice, no optimal and universal tinnitus treatment has been reached yet. This fact is to some extent a consequence of the high heterogeneity of the methodologies used in tinnitus related clinical studies. In this manuscript, we have identified, summarized, and critically appraised tinnitus-related randomized clinical trials since 2010, aiming at systematically mapping the research conducted in this area. The results of our analysis of the 73 included randomized clinical trials provide important insight on the identification of limitations of previous works, methodological pitfalls or gaps in current knowledge, a prerequisite for the adequate interpretation of current literature and execution of future studies.
机译:虽然目前正在研究各种耳鸣管理干预措施,但临床实践已经应用了各种治疗干预措施,但尚未达到最佳和通用耳鸣治疗。这一事实是在某种程度上存在耳鸣相关临床研究中使用的方法的高异质性的结果。在本手稿中,我们已经确定,概述和危重评估了耳鸣相关的随机临床试验,旨在系统地描绘该领域进行的研究。我们对73分析的分析结果包括随机临床试验在目前知识中的识别,方法陷阱或差距的识别方面提供了重要的见解,这是对当前文献和未来研究执行的充分解释的先决条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号