首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Does Cannabis Cocaine and Alcohol Use Impact Differently on Adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Picture?
【2h】

Does Cannabis Cocaine and Alcohol Use Impact Differently on Adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Picture?

机译:大麻可卡因和酒精使用不同于成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍临床图片吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While the association between adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (A-ADHD) and Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) has been widely explored, less attention has been dedicated to the various substance use variants. In a previous paper, we identified two variants: type 1 (use of stimulants/alcohol) and type 2 (use of cannabinoids). In this study, we compared demographic, clinical and symptomatologic features between Dual Disorder A-ADHD (DD/A-ADHD) patients according to our substance use typology, and A-ADHD without DD (NDD/A-ADHD) ones. NDD patients were more frequently diagnosed as belonging to inattentive ADHD subtype compared with type 1 DD/A-ADHD patients, but not with respect to type 2 DD/ADHD. NDD/A-ADHD patients showed less severe symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity than DD/A-ADHD type 1, but not type 2. Type 1 and type 2 patients shared the feature of displaying higher impulsiveness than NDD/A-ADHD ones. General psychopathology scores were more severe in type 2 DD/ADHD patients, whereas type 1 patients showed greater similarity to NDD/A-ADHD. Legal problems were more strongly represented in type 1 than in type 2 patients or NDD/A-ADHD ones. Our results suggest that type 1 and type 2 substance use differ in their effects on A-ADHD patients—an outcome that brings with it different likely implications in dealing with the diagnostic and therapeutic processes.
机译:虽然成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(A-ADHD)和物质使用障碍(SUD)之间的关联得到了广泛的探索,但迫切关注各种物质使用变体。在先前的论文中,我们鉴定了两种变体:1型(使用兴奋剂/醇)和2型(使用大麻素)。在这项研究中,我们根据我们的物质使用类型学和没有DD(NDD / A-ADHD)的A-Adhd,比较了双疾病A-ADHD(DD / A-ADHD)患者之间的人口统计学,临床和症状特征。与类型1 DD / A-ADHD患者相比,NDD患者更常常被诊断为属于异常的ADHD亚型,但不相对于2型DD / ADHD。 NDD / A-ADHD患者表现出比DD / A-ADHD 1型多动/冲击的严重症状,但不是类型2. 1型和2型患者分享了比NDD / A-ADHD脉冲更高的冲动的特征。 2型DD / ADHD患者的一般精神病理学分数更严重,而1型患者与NDD / A-ADHD均相似。在1型中,法律问题比2型患者或NDD / A-ADHD系列更强烈。我们的研究结果表明,1型和2型物质用途对A-ADHD患者的影响有所不同 - 这一结果使其具有不同的可能在处理诊断和治疗过程方面的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号