首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Intraoral Periapical and Direct Digital Radiographs in Detecting Interdental Bone Loss
【2h】

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Intraoral Periapical and Direct Digital Radiographs in Detecting Interdental Bone Loss

机译:常规口腔根尖和X线片在诊断牙间骨丢失中的诊断准确性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the supporting tissues of the teeth caused by specific microorganisms, resulting in destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Progressive loss of alveolar bone is the salient feature of periodontal disease. Accurate detection of periodontal disease with the use of radiographs helps in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.>Aims: The present study aims to compare the efficacy of conventional intraoral periapical (IOPA) and direct digital radiographs (RVG) in detecting interdental alveolar bone loss using intrasurgical (IS) measurements as the gold standard.>Materials and Methods: Thirty patients elected to undergo periodontal flap surgery with periodontitis computing to 60 interdental alveolar defects on mandibular first molars were considered. IOPA and RVG were captured using standardized techniques. Bone loss measurements in IOPA and RVG were compared to the IS measurements.>Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was carried out using student t test and ANOVA with the help of SPSS software and p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.>Results: Both IOPA and RVG underestimated the bone loss measurements when compared to IS measurements which was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Bone loss measurements in RVG were closer to IS measurements than IOPA.>Conclusion: Both the radiographic techniques IOPA and RVG underestimated bone loss by 1.5–2.5 mm. RVG was superior to IOPA for the detection of interdental bone loss due to reduced time and radiation exposure to obtain the same diagnostic information.
机译:>背景:牙周炎是由特定的微生物引起的牙齿支撑组织的炎症性疾病,导致牙周膜和牙槽骨的破坏。牙槽骨的逐渐丢失是牙周疾病的主要特征。 >目的:本研究旨在比较常规口内牙周根尖术(IOPA)和直接数字X线摄片(RVG)的疗效,以期诊断,治疗和预后。 >材料和方法:考虑将30例接受牙周皮瓣手术治疗并经牙周炎计算为下颌第一磨牙的60例齿间牙槽缺损的患者。 IOPA和RVG是使用标准化技术捕获的。将IOPA和RVG中的骨丢失测量值与IS测量值进行比较。>统计分析:使用Student t检验和SPSS软件借助ANOVA进行统计分析,将p值<0.05视为>结果:与具有统计学意义的IS测量相比,IOPA和RVG均低估了骨损失测量值(p <0.0001)。 RVG的骨丢失测量值比IOPA更接近IS测量值。>结论:放射成像技术IOPA和RVG均低估了1.5-2.5 mm的骨丢失。 RVG优于IOPA在检测因减少时间和辐射而获得相同诊断信息的齿间骨丢失方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号