首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diagnostics >The Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) on Executive Functioning Attention and Memory in Rehabilitation Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
【2h】

The Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) on Executive Functioning Attention and Memory in Rehabilitation Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

机译:非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对创伤性脑损伤康复患者的执行功能关注和记忆的影响:系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years, the potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for therapeutic effects on cognitive functions has been explored for populations with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is no systematic NIBS review of TBI cognitive impairment with a focus on stimulation sites and stimulation parameters. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review examining the effectiveness and safety of NIBS for cognitive impairment after a TBI. This study was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews (CRD42020183298). All English articles from the following databases were searched from inception up to 31 December 2020: Pubmed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL. Randomized and prospective controlled trials, including cross-over studies, were included for analysis. Studies with at least five individuals with TBI, whereby at least five sessions of NIBS were provided and used standardized neuropsychological measurement of cognition, were included. A total of five studies met eligibility criteria. Two studies used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and three studies used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The pooled sample size was 44 individuals for rTMS and 91 for tDCS. Three of five studies combined cognitive training or additional therapy (computer assisted) with NIBS. Regarding rTMS, target symptoms included attention (n = 2), memory (n = 1), and executive function (n = 2); only one study showing significant improvement compared than control group with respect to attention. In tDCS studies, target symptoms included cognition (n = 2), attention (n = 3), memory (n = 3), working memory (WM) (n = 3), and executive function (n = 1); two of three studies showed significant improvement compared to the control group with respect to attention and memory. The evidence for NIBS effectiveness in rehabilitation of cognitive function in TBI is still in its infancy, more studies are needed. In all studies, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was selected as the stimulation site, along with the stimulation pattern promoting the activation of the left DLPFC. In some studies, there was a significant improvement compared to the control group, but neither rTMS nor tDCS had sufficient evidence of effectiveness. To the establishment of evidence we need the evaluation of brain activity at the stimulation site and related areas using neuroimaging on how NIBS acts on the neural network.
机译:近年来,非侵入性的脑刺激(NIBS)对认知功能治疗效果的潜力已经探讨了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的人群。然而,重点是刺激部位和刺激参数的TBI认知障碍没有系统的复习生命科学研究所。这项研究的目的是要进行系统的回顾检查一TBI后的效果和认知功能障碍NIBS的安全性。本研究用前瞻性的系统评价(CRD42020183298)的PROSPERO数据库中注册。从以下数据库的所有英文文章,从成立之初搜索12月31日2020年考研/ MEDLINE,SCOPUS,CINAHL,文摘,PsycINFO和中央。随机和前瞻性对照试验,包括交叉研究中,纳入分析。与至少五个个人与TBI,由此NIBS的至少五个会话,并用于标准化的认知神经心理测量研究,都包括在内。共有5个研究满足合格标准。两项研究使用重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS治疗),并用经颅直流电刺激(TDCS)三项研究。合并样本大小是为rTMS治疗44名个人和91 TDCS。 5个研究三者合用,具有NIBS认知训练或辅助治疗(计算机辅助)。关于磁刺激,靶症状包括注意(N = 2),存储器(N = 1),和执行功能(N = 2);只有一项研究显示出比相对于关注对照组相比显著改善。在TDCS研究中,目标症状包括认知(N = 2),注意力(N = 3),存储器(N = 3),工作存储器(WM)(N = 3),和执行功能(N = 1);相比相对于注意力和记忆力对照组二三研究表明显著改善。仍处于起步阶段,都需要在TBI认知功能的康复NIBS有效性的证据进行更多的研究。在所有研究中,背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)作为刺激部位,与刺激模式推进右DLPFC的激活一起。在一些研究中,有一个显著的改善较对照组,但既不颅磁刺激,也不TDCS有成效的充分证据。要建立的证据,我们需要大脑活动的刺激部位的评价和使用上NIBS如何作用于神经网络的神经影像学相关的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号