首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >The Evaluation of Effect of Developer Age in the Detection of Approximal Caries Using Three Speed Dental X-Ray Films: An In-Vitro Study
【2h】

The Evaluation of Effect of Developer Age in the Detection of Approximal Caries Using Three Speed Dental X-Ray Films: An In-Vitro Study

机译:评估显影剂年龄对使用三速牙科X射线胶片检测龋齿的影响:一项体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and Objectives: Ever since the first radiograph was taken in 1895, radiographs have become an essential part of dental practice. Since radiation exposure for the patients is a major concern, it is important for us to reduce the radiation exposure to the patient and surrounding environment, without compromising the quality of image. Since improper film processing is one of the major causes of poor image quality, it is very important to test dental films under a variety of processing conditions. So this study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy between Kodak Ultraspeed, Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 Comfort films for the detection of approximal caries in fresh as well as in aged processing solution.>Methods: Hundred extracted unrestored maxillary and mandibular teeth were aligned in a group of five teeth in each plaster model. Total of 20 plaster models were constructed and only 3 teeth in the middle were utilized for the study. The final sample consisted of 60 teeth in the study. The exposure time for Ultraspeed film was standardized at 0.5 seconds and for Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 films, the exposure time was 0.32 seconds. For each radiograph two blocks were used simulating bitewing radiograph. All 20 plaster blocks were exposed using three film types at standardized exposure timings with 30 radiographs each week. The procedure was repeated every week until 6 weeks. Radiographs were evaluated by an observer and assessed by following four point scale 0- sound tooth, 1- lesion in enamel, 2- lesion in amelodentinal junction, 3- dentinal lesion. Only distal surfaces were assessed. Thereafter all the teeth were subjected for histological study and actual depth of the lesion was recorded which acted as gold standard and this reading was subtracted in observer readings after radiographic examination. All data collected were analyzed statistically using ANOVA, paired and unpaired t-tests.>Results: Ektaspeed and Agfa films required less exposure compared to Ultraspeed film. With respect to film, all films had equal diagnostic accuracy upto three weeks. From fourth week Ultraspeed and Agfa films were considerably better than E speed film. E speed film was inferior in the depleted solution compared to other two solutions. With respect to lesion detection Agfa film was inferior to other two films.>Conclusion: All three films had equal diagnostic accuracy in fresh solution. Considering the significant reduction in patient radiation with Ektaspeed film, this should be the film of choice whenever possible. As far as the diagnosis of approximal caries is concerned processing solutions should not be used longer than 3 weeks.
机译:>背景和目的:自1895年拍摄第一张射线照相以来,射线照相已成为牙科实践的重要组成部分。由于患者的辐射暴露是一个主要问题,因此对我们来说重要的是在不影响图像质量的前提下减少对患者和周围环境的辐射暴露。由于膜处理不当是图像质量差的主要原因之一,因此在各种处理条件下测试牙科膜非常重要。因此,本研究旨在比较柯达Ultraspeed,Ektaspeed和Agfa Dentus M2 Comfort膜在新鲜和老化处理溶液中检测龋齿的诊断准确性。>方法:上百种未修复的上颌提取物在每个石膏模型中,下颌牙齿和下颌牙齿排列成一组,每组五个牙齿。共构建了20个石膏模型,中间仅使用了3个牙齿进行研究。最终样本包括60颗牙齿。 Ultraspeed胶片的曝光时间标准化为0.5秒,Ektaspeed和Agfa Dentus M2胶片的曝光时间为0.32秒。对于每个射线照相,使用两个块来模拟咬合射线照相。使用三种胶片类型,在标准的曝光时间对所有20个石膏块进行曝光,每周进行30张射线照相。每周重复该过程,直到6周。放射线照片由观察者评估,并按照以下四个点的等级进行评估:0音齿,1牙釉质病变,2牙周交界病变,3牙本质病变。仅评估远端表面。此后,对所有牙齿进行组织学研究,并记录病变的实际深度,作为金标准,并在射线照相检查后的观察者读数中减去该读数。使用ANOVA,配对和非配对t检验对收集到的所有数据进行统计分析。>结果:与Ultraspeed胶片相比,Ektaspeed和Agfa胶片所需的曝光更少。对于胶片,所有胶片在三周内的诊断准确性均相等。从第四周开始,Ultraspeed和Agfa胶片比E speed胶片好得多。与其他两种溶液相比,贫液中的E速度膜性能较差。在病变检测方面,爱克发(Agfa)胶片不如其他两张胶片。>结论:这三张胶片在新鲜溶液中的诊断准确性均相同。考虑到Ektaspeed胶片可大大减少患者的辐射,因此应尽可能选择这种胶片。就诊断龋齿而言,加工溶液的使用时间不得超过3周。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号