首页> 外文学位 >The use of digital radiographic images and film radiographs for the detection of approximal carious lesions in a clinical study.
【24h】

The use of digital radiographic images and film radiographs for the detection of approximal carious lesions in a clinical study.

机译:在临床研究中,使用数字射线照相图像和胶片X射线照片来检测大约龋齿病变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As a part of a larger study on new methods for early caries detection in a clinical trial, a radiographic clinical study was done involving 150 children, age 9–12 years. The purpose of the study was to compare direct digital radiographs and film radiographs for detection of approximal caries. Radiographic films (XR) were taken at baseline and 12 months, and direct digital radiographic images (DDR) were taken at baseline, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. The direct digital images were captured on Schick sensors (size 1 and 2), and the films on Kodak Ektaspeed Plus. The direct digital images, and the radiographic films were read by two examiners, one using the traditional scoring method (yes/no), and the other using a new detailed scoring method (lesion presence scored on a 5-step confidence scale, and lesion depth in 9 steps). Results were similar for both scoring systems, both examiners detected about 20% more lesions on films. Repeatability was also similar, with Kappa and weighted Kappa in the range of 0.7 to 0.8 for the two scoring systems, respectively. Radiographs were superior to visual examination in finding approximal lesions. Comparisons between the two scoring systems showed numerical differences, but that the main reason was selection of different cut-off points by the examiners. The radiographic readings alone were not sufficient to show a statistically significant difference between treatment groups used in the clinical trial. Validation of radiographic scoring was done on fifty-three exfoliated primary teeth. Histological evaluation done under a stereomicroscope, showed a difference between the methods, with the film scoring being more accurate that the digital image scoring (p = 0.0443). Clinical parameters were also explored, in particular the amount of radiation to the subjects and number of exposures used. Total amount of radiation used in this study was found to be similar to the amount received during regular 6-monthly dental visits over the same time period. In this first direct clinical comparison between these two radiographic methods for approximal caries detection, reading of the traditional films revealed a greater number of lesions than of the direct digital images.
机译:作为一项临床试验中有关早期龋齿检测新方法的大型研究的一部分,进行了一项放射学临床研究,涉及150名9-12岁的儿童。这项研究的目的是比较直接数字X射线照片和胶片X射线照片以检测近似龋齿。在基线和12个月时拍摄X射线胶片(XR),在基线,4个月,8个月和12个月时拍摄直接数字X射线照片(DDR)。直接数字图像在Schick传感器(尺寸1和2)上拍摄,胶片在Kodak Ektaspeed Plus上拍摄。两名检查员读取了直接数字图像和X射线胶片,一个使用传统的评分方法(是/否),另一个使用了新的详细评分方法(病变的存在以5步置信度评分和病变评分) 9步的深度)。两种评分系统的结果均相似,两名检查者均在胶片上发现了多20%的损伤。重复性也相似,两个评分系统的Kappa和加权Kappa分别在0.7到0.8的范围内。射线照相在发现近似病变方面优于视觉检查。两种评分系统之间的比较显示出数值差异,但是主要原因是考官选择了不同的分界点。仅放射线照相读数不足以显示临床试验中使用的治疗组之间的统计学显着差异。在53颗脱落的乳牙上进行了放射学评分的验证。在体视显微镜下进行的组织学评估显示出这两种方法之间的差异,胶片评分比数字图像评分更准确(p = 0.0443)。还探讨了临床参数,特别是对受试者的辐射量和所用的暴露次数。发现该研究中使用的放射总量与在同一时间定期进行的每6个月一次牙科访视中获得的放射量相似。在这两种射线照相方法之间的首次直接临床比较中,大约可以检测到龋齿,与传统的数字图像相比,传统胶片的读取显示出更多的病变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eggertsson, Hafsteinn.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 口腔科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号