首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology >Effects of Different Resistance Training Frequencies on Body Composition Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Handgrip Strength in Overweight and Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Effects of Different Resistance Training Frequencies on Body Composition Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Handgrip Strength in Overweight and Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:超重和肥胖妇女体组成心脏素质危险因素和手工强度的不同阻力训练频率:随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Resistance training improves health in obese and overweight people. However, it is not clear what is the optimal weekly resistance training frequency and the most efficacious training protocol on body composition, cardiometabolic risk factors, and handgrip strength (HS). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a supervised structured 24 week resistance training program on obese and overweight women. Methods: Forty-five women (BMI 37.1 ± 6.3 kg/m2; age 56.5 ± 0.7 years) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A group with a high weekly training frequency of three times a week (HIGH) and a group that performed it only once a week (LOW). Cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometric and HS measures were taken before and after the intervention period. Results: A significant (p < 0.05) group by time interaction was observed for body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, fat mass, plasma glucose, plasma insulin, homeostatic model assessment, and for dominant and absolute HS. Additionally, only the HIGH group saw increased HS and decreased total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol after the intervention period (p < 0.05). The observed increase in HS was associated with an improved insulin resistance sensitivity (absolute handgrip strength: r = −0.40, p = 0.007; relative handgrip strength: r = −0.47, p = 0.001) after training, which constitutes an essential element for cardiovascular health. Conclusions: The results suggest that high weekly frequency training give greater benefits for weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors improvement than a training program with a training session of once a week. Furthermore, the improvement of HS can be achieved with a high weekly frequency training.
机译:背景:抗性训练在肥胖和超重人民中提高了健康。然而,目前尚不清楚最佳的每周阻力训练频率和身体成分,心脏素质危险因素和手工强度(HS)的最有效的训练协议是什么。本研究的目的是确定监督结构化24周阻力培训方案对肥胖和超重妇女的影响。方法:四十五名女性(BMI 37.1±6.3千克/平方米;年龄56.5±0.7岁)被随机分配到两组中的一组:一组每周训练频率的一周(高)和一组每周只执行一次(低)。在干预期之前和之后采取了心尖危险因素,人体测量和HS措施。结果:对体重,体重指数,腰围,脂肪质量,血浆葡萄糖,血浆胰岛素,稳态模型评估以及主导和绝对HS,观察到逐时相互作用的显着(P <0.05)组。另外,在干预期后,只有高群锯增加HS并降低总胆固醇和LDL-胆固醇(P <0.05)。观察到的HS的增加与胰岛素抗性敏感性的改善有关(绝对手柄强度:r = -0.40,p = 0.007;相对手柄强度:r = -0.47,p = 0.001),其构成心血管的基本要素健康。结论:结果表明,高每周频率训练对减肥和心脏差价危险因素的更大效益,而不是每周培训课程的培训计划。此外,可以通过高每周频率训练实现HS的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号