首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Comparative Evaluation of Sorption Solubility and Microhardness of Heat Cure Polymethylmethacrylate Denture Base Resin Flexible Denture Base Resin
【2h】

Comparative Evaluation of Sorption Solubility and Microhardness of Heat Cure Polymethylmethacrylate Denture Base Resin Flexible Denture Base Resin

机译:热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯假牙基体树脂和柔性假牙基体树脂的吸附性溶解性和显微硬度的比较评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare sorption, solubility and microhardness of heat cure polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin and flexible (thermoplastic polyamide nylon) denture base resin.>Materials and Methods: Sorption, solubility and microhardness were assessed to determine compliance with ADA Specification no. 12. Results were assessed using statistical and observational analyses.>Result: All materials satisfied ADA requirements for sorption, solubility and microhardness. Heat cure PMMA showed more sorption, solubility and microhardness than flexible (thermoplastic polyamide nylon).>Conclusion: Flexible (thermoplastic polyamide nylon) resin absorbs less water, is less soluble and is more flexible than PMMA.
机译:>目的:研究的目的是评估和比较热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基体树脂和柔性(热塑性聚酰胺尼龙)义齿基体树脂的吸附,溶解性和显微硬度。>材料和方法:评估吸附性,溶解性和显微硬度,以确定是否符合ADA规范No. 12.使用统计和观察分析对结果进行评估。>结果:所有材料均满足ADA对吸附,溶解度和显微硬度的要求。热固型PMMA表现出比柔性(热塑性聚酰胺尼龙)更高的吸附性,溶解性和显微硬度。>结论:柔性(热塑性聚酰胺尼龙)树脂比PMMA吸收更少的水,更少的溶解性和更大的柔性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号