首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Forensic Science International: Synergy >Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation
【2h】

Digital evidence exceptionalism? A review and discussion of conceptual hurdles in digital evidence transformation

机译:数字证据异常?数字证据转型概念障碍的审查与讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Forensic science is currently undergoing a transformation and expansion to include modern types of evidence, such as evidence generated by digital investigations. This development is said to raise a series of challenges, both in operational and conceptual dimensions. This paper reviews and discusses a series of convoluted conceptual hurdles that are encountered in connection with the use of digital evidence as part of evidence and proof processes at trial, in contradistinction to investigative uses of such types of evidence. As a recent example raising such hurdles, we analyse and discuss assertions and proposals made in the article “Digital Evidence Certainty Descriptors (DECDs)” by Graeme Horsman (32 Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation (2020) 200896).
机译:法医学目前正在进行转型和扩张,包括现代的证据,例如数字调查产生的证据。据说这种发展促进了一系列挑战,无论是在运作和概念的方面。本文审查和讨论了一系列复杂的概念障碍,与使用数字证据作为审判的证据和证明流程的一部分遇到的,符合此类证据的调查用途。作为最近的一个例子,提出了这种障碍,我们分析并讨论了格劳雷姆·霍尔曼(32号法医学)“数字证据确定性描述符(DECDS)中所作的断言和提案”(32个法医学国际:数字调查(2020)200896)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号