首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Seminars in Interventional Radiology >Penetrating Extremity Trauma Endovascular versus Open Repair?
【2h】

Penetrating Extremity Trauma Endovascular versus Open Repair?

机译:穿透肢体创伤血管内与开放修复?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Penetrating extremity trauma (PET) accounts for an estimated 5–15% of trauma with vascular injury and these injuries are accountable for a significant percentage of trauma-related deaths. Historically, vascular injuries were best treated by open repair. While a defined selection criteria and a comprehensive algorithm have not been validated, the advancement of endovascular techniques, embolotherapy, and stent grafting have become viable options for the treatment of penetrating arterial extremity trauma in select patients. Advantages endovascular repair offers include decreasing mortality and morbidity associated with open repair, decreasing blood loss, decreasing iatrogenic injury such as nerve injury, and lower rate of wound infection. Patients stability, type of vascular injury, and lesion location are main factors help deciding between endovascular and open repair. Patient selection between endovascular and open repair should be determined by on a case-by-case situation, individual hospital guidelines, a multidisciplinary approach, and technical expertise.
机译:渗透肢体创伤(PET)估计估计有5-15%的血管损伤创伤,这些伤害是对创伤的显着百分比令人责任。从历史上看,通过开放的修复最佳治疗血管损伤。虽然未经验证了定义的选择标准和全面的算法,但血管内技术的进步,栓塞治疗和支架移植的进步已经成为选择患者渗透动脉末端创伤的可行选择。优点血管内修复提供的优点包括降低与开放修复,降低血液损失的死亡率和发病率,降低治疗损伤,如神经损伤,以及较低的伤口感染率。患者稳定性,血管损伤类型,病变位置是有助于血管内和开放修复的主要因素。血管内和开放式修复之间的患者选择应由逐个案例,个人医院指南,多学科方法和技术专业知识确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号