首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery >Recent prospective data regarding good survival outcome after radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases from colorectal cancer: the radiation oncologist point of view
【2h】

Recent prospective data regarding good survival outcome after radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases from colorectal cancer: the radiation oncologist point of view

机译:近期生存结局近期生存结局的近期预期数据 - 放射肿瘤学家的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

About 20% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present metastatic spread at diagnosis and another 20–30% of them will develop distant progression after curative resection of the primary tumor (1). In the last years, the available treatment for lung metastases has been progressively improved due to implementation of modern non-invasive or minimally invasive techniques. Their use could be able to improve survival in the oligometastatic state of selected categories of patient with slow growth tumor disease (2). Surgery is the most used treatment in the oligometastatic disease of patients with primary CRC, followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) called also stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). SABR is a non-invasive procedure that could be used in patients not suitable to surgery, due to comorbidities or advanced age, obtaining high rates of local control comparable to surgical series (3-5). A meta-analysis by Cao et al. (6) regarding SBRT of lung metastases analyzing 18 relevant studies in this field, reported 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 60%, 52% and 13%, respectively. More recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is acquiring an increased interest in the scientific community due to its effectiveness and safety. This kind of therapy is minimally invasive, could be performed with less costs in one treatment procedure and could be repeated in case of residual or recurrent local disease. However, evidence regarding RFA is still weak due to leak of large retrospective data and poor clinical use compared to surgery or SABR. Data analysis in a large series patients included in the CLOCC trial (7), reported 14,5% of local recurrence per patient an 6% per lesion after RFA of liver metastases from CRC. Moreover, for lesion <3 cm, tumor recurrence rates were demonstrated to be under 3%. RFA could also be repeated up to four times in the treatment of small lung metastases <2–3 cm (8).
机译:大约20%的结肠直肠癌(CRC)目前在诊断下的转移扩散,其中20-30%的20-30%将在原发性肿瘤的治疗切除后显着进展(1)。在过去几年中,由于现代无侵入性或微创技术的实施,肺转移的可用治疗已经逐步改善。他们的用途可以能够改善所选类别的患者的寡聚末端患者的生存肿瘤疾病(2)。手术是初级CRC患者的寡聚疾病中最常用的治疗方法,其次是典型的身体放射疗法(SBRT)也称为立体定向烧蚀放疗(SABR)。 SABR是一种非侵入性程序,可用于由于合并症或晚期的患者不适合手术,从而获得与手术系列(3-5)相当的局部控制的高速率。 Cao等人的META分析。 (6)关于肺转移的SBRT分析该领域的18项相关研究,报告了3年的局部对照(LC),整体存活(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)分别为60%,52%和13% 。最近,由于其有效性和安全性,射频消融(RFA)正在获得对科学界的兴趣。这种治疗是微创的,可以在一个治疗程序中以较少的成本进行,并且在残留或复发的局部疾病的情况下可以重复。然而,由于大型回顾性数据泄漏和与手术或SABR相比,有关RFA的证据仍然弱。 CLOCC试验中包括的大型系列患者的数据分析(7),报告每位患者每患者的局部患者局部复发为14.5%,每病灶在来自CRC的RFA后的6%。此外,对于病变<3cm,肿瘤复发率被证明是3%以下。 RFA也可以在肺部肺转移的处理中重复四次<2-3cm(8)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号