首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >PSX-22 Evaluation of average fiber diameter measurements by FibreLux micron meter and OFDA2000
【2h】

PSX-22 Evaluation of average fiber diameter measurements by FibreLux micron meter and OFDA2000

机译:PSX-22通过Fibrelux微米米和OFDA2000评估平均纤维直径测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Average fiber diameter (AFD) of wool is one of the most important measurements for determining the value of wool and for improving its quality through selective breeding. A new instrument the FibreLux Micron Meter™ (FL) was compared to the OFDA2000, both of which are meant for on-farm measurement of AFD. Mid-side samples were collected, a staple removed and measured on the OFDA2000 and then on the FL. Measurements with the OFDA2000 and FL were made on-farm prior to shearing. The same staple was taken to the laboratory and measured on the Laser Scan (LS) a reference method for AFD. All measurements were compared using the IWTO-0 Appendix B (2002) procedure for comparison of methods. The OFDA2000 compared favorably to the LS. The slope did not differ from 1 (P = 0.44), there was no level dependent bias(P = 0.46), and r = 0.94. Compared to the LS the FL slope (1.15) differed from 1 (P = 0.03), and there was level dependent bias (P = 0.03), and r = 0.77. The FL underpredicted AFD in fine wools and overpredicted AFD on coarse wools. Samples that measured 15 µm by the reference method would be expected to measure 14.3 µm on the FL and samples that measured 25 µm on the LS would measure 25.7 µm on the FL. A comparison between the FL and the OFDA2000 showed that the results were similar to previously reported results from our laboratory that were conducted on samples in the lab. The FL is suitable for on-farm testing of AFD for selecting animals to improve AFD and for classing wool.
机译:羊毛的平均纤维直径(AFD)是确定羊毛价值和通过选择性育种来提高其质量的最重要的测量之一。将Fibrelux Micron Meter™(FL)的新仪器与OFDA2000进行比较,两者都是用于AFD的农场测量。收集中侧样品,取出钉,并在OFDA2000上测量,然后在FL上测量。在剪切之前,在农场中进行OFDA2000和FL的测量。对实验室采用相同的钉,并在激光扫描(LS)上测量AFD的参考方法。使用IWTO-0附录B(2002)程序进行比较所有测量以进行比较方法。 OFDA2000对LS有利相比。斜率与1没有不同(P = 0.44),没有水平依赖性偏置(P = 0.46),r = 0.94。与LS相比,FL斜率(1.15)不同于1(p = 0.03),并且水平依赖性偏压(p = 0.03),r = 0.77。在粗羊毛上的细羊毛和过度预测的AFD中的流体不足。通过参考方法测量15μm的样品将期望在FL上测量14.3μm,在LS上测量的25μm的样品将测量25.7μm。 FL和OFDA2000之间的比较表明,结果与先前报道的结果类似于我们实验室的实验室的结果。 FL适用于用于选择动物以改善AFD和甲型羊毛的农用测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号