首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >PSV-3 Effects of space allowance and marketing strategy on growth performance of pigs raised to heavy market weights
【2h】

PSV-3 Effects of space allowance and marketing strategy on growth performance of pigs raised to heavy market weights

机译:PSV-3空间津贴和营销策略对饲养重型市场重量增长性能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 976 pigs (PIC 327×L42, initially 22 ± 1.5 kg BW) were used in a 160-d study to determine the influence of space allowance and marketing strategy on performance of pigs raised to heavy market weights (165 kg). Pens were blocked by location and allotted to 1 of 6 treatments with 8 pens/treatment. The first four treatments reduced space allowance/pig via initial pen stocking density: 14 pigs/pen (1.20 m2/pig), 17 pigs/pen (0.98 m2/pig), 20 pigs/pen (0.84 m2/pig), or 23 pigs/pen (0.73 m2/pig). The fifth treatment began with 25 pigs/pen (0.67 m2/pig) and the heaviest 3 pigs/pen were removed on d 93, then on d 122 pens were marketed to a common inventory of 20 pigs/pen, and on d 147 marketed to a common pen inventory of 17 pigs/pen. The sixth treatment began with 23 pigs/pen (0.73 m2/pig) and were marketed to a common inventory of 20 pigs/pen on d 108 and marketed to a common inventory of 17 pigs/pen on d 147. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with pen as the experimental unit. Overall (d 0 to 160) ADG, ADFI, and final BW decreased (linear, P < 0.001) and G:F increased (quadratic, P = 0.042) as space allowance decreased. When comparing treatments with multiple marketing events (treatments 5 and 6) to treatment 4, there was no evidence for differences (P > 0.05) for overall ADG or ADFI; however, overall G:F was improved (P < 0.05) for pigs initially stocked at 0.67 m2/pig and marketed four times compared to both treatments that initially allowed 0.73 m2/pig, regardless of marketing structure. These results indicate that decreasing space allowance of heavy weight pigs reduces growth, feed intake and final BW, although use of multiple marketing events prior to final marketing may allow for increased number of pigs marketed/pen while balancing reduced growth performance often associated with increased stocking density. http://www.conferenceharvester.com/
机译:在160-D研究中使用总共976只猪(PIC 327×L42,最初22±1.5千克BW),以确定空间津贴和营销策略对饲养重型市场重量(165公斤)的猪的性能的影响。钢笔被定位堵塞,并分配给6种治疗中的8个,8株术/治疗。前四项治疗通过初始钢笔放养密度减少空间津贴/猪:14猪/笔(1.20m2 /猪),17只猪/笔(0.98m2 /猪),20只猪/笔(0.84m2 /猪),或23粒猪/笔(0.73平方米/猪)。第五次治疗始于25只猪/笔(0.67m2 /猪),最重的3猪/笔在D 93上除去,然后在D 122钢笔上被销售到20只猪/笔的常见库存,以及D 147销售对于17只猪/笔的普通笔库存。第六次治疗始于23只猪/笔(0.73平方米/猪),并将其销售到D 108上的20只猪/笔的常见库存,并以17只猪/笔在D 147上销售到一个常见的库存。使用proc分析数据用笔为实验单位的Glimmix。整体(D 0至160)ADG,ADFI和最终BW(LINEAR,P <0.001)和G:F增加(如二次,P = 0.042),因为空间余量降低。在将具有多种营销事件(治疗5和6)的治疗进行比较4时,总体ADG或ADFI的差异(p> 0.05)没有证据;然而,总体g:f改善(P <0.05),猪最初储存在0.67m2 /猪,与初始允许0.73m2 /猪的治疗相比销售四次,无论营销结构如何。这些结果表明,减少重量猪的空间含量降低了生长,进料摄入和最终BW,尽管在最终营销前使用多个营销事件可能允许增加猪销售/笔的数量,同时平衡往往与载体增加相关的增长性能密度。 http://www.conferenceharvester.com/

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号