首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dose-Response >Letter to Editor Re: Fang et al entitled Assessment of Genomic Instabilityin Medical Workers Exposed to Chronic Low-Dose X-Rays in Northern China
【2h】

Letter to Editor Re: Fang et al entitled Assessment of Genomic Instabilityin Medical Workers Exposed to Chronic Low-Dose X-Rays in Northern China

机译:致编辑的信Re:Fang等人题为基因组不稳定的评估在中国北方的慢性低剂量X射线暴露于慢性低剂量X射线中的医学工人

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With great concern, we read an article by Fang et al entitled “Assessment of GenomicInstability in Medical Workers Exposed to Chronic Low-Dose X-Rays in NorthernChina” recently published in the journal Dose-Response.1 This is an important issue associated with radiation protection since the accurateassessment of health risks from such low-dose radiation remains challenging and controversial.However, the presentation and conclusion of this work are ambiguous. We focus our comments onthe foremost limitation of the article by Fang et al1 (ie, the analyses of cytogenetic data) that weakens their conclusion of a strongcorrelation between genomic instability and the duration of exposure to low-dose radiation.The use of working years to categorize the subjects is inappropriate and should not be usedsince there were large variations in exposure levels in each group of workers. A more accuratemetric to relate biological damage to exposure is the level of radiation dose.
机译:非常关注,我们读了一篇文章,由Fang等人题为“基因组评估在北部暴露于慢性低剂量X射线的医疗工作者中的不稳定中国“最近发表于杂志 - 反应.1这是与准确的辐射保护相关的重要问题从这种低剂量辐射的健康风险评估仍然具有挑战性和争议。但是,这项工作的演示和结论是模棱两可的。我们专注于我们的意见Fang等Al1(即细胞遗传学数据分析)的最重要限制削弱了他们的结论基因组不稳定性与低剂量辐射持续时间的相关性。使用工作年份分类主题是不合适的,不应使用由于每组工人都有很大的曝光率。更准确公制将生物损伤联系到暴露是辐射剂量的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号