首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Nursing >Development and psychometric assessment of the triage nurses’ professional capability questionnaire in the emergency department
【2h】

Development and psychometric assessment of the triage nurses’ professional capability questionnaire in the emergency department

机译:在急诊部门的分类护士专业能力问卷的发展和心理测量评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the qualitative phase of the study, subjects were selected according to purposeful sampling and the inclusion criteria. Data were collected using the personal interviews, focus interviews, and observation. Accordingly, 24 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in which, 20 nurses (18 triage nurses and two triage head nurses), two general practitioners, and two emergency medicine specialists were interviewed face-to-face. In addition, two focus interview sessions were held with a group of five triage nurses and the triage unit was observed by the researcher for 48 h. The inclusion criteria for the nursing staff were having a bachelor’s degree in nursing and at least 1 year of professional practice; the emergency doctors were required to be at least a General Practitioner (GP) and have working experience of 6 months in the triage. Both nurses and doctors were included only if they were willing to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were not being physically or emotionally fit for participation and having mental or cognitive disorders. Each individual interview lasted from approximately 60 to 90 min and each focus group interview lasted from approximately 90 to 120 min. All the interviews were conducted in the conference hall of the hospital. To make sure that the main subjects of the study were discussed during the interviews, the researchers devised and used an interview form: the first section of the form addressed the participants’ demographics and the second part was an interview guide. The guide stated that the participants should share their perspectives on and experiences of capabilities in triage. Explanations were provided if a participant found the concept of capability ambiguous. At the beginning of each interview, after the objective of the study had been explained, a few descriptive questions about the work experience, education, etc. of the respondent were asked. Subsequently, questions related to the subject of the study were asked, e.g. “Based on your experiences, what capabilities should triage nurses possess?”, and “As a triage nurse, have you ever had an experience which made you feel that you possess the necessary capabilities in a triage nurse? In addition, to increase the clarity of the information provided by the participants, the researchers included follow-up questions, e.g. “Can you explain that further? “What do you mean by that?, “Can you give an example or share one of your experiences?”. Overall, 12 observation sessions (48 h) were carried out in the present study. Each session lasted 4 h and all work shifts were included for observation. All the verbal and non-verbal communication of the triage nurses and their manner of interaction with the patients and their companions, their colleagues, and the emergency doctors, as well as their cooperation and participation in teamwork were monitored and recorded exactly as they were. In addition, the researchers observed and recorded the nurses’ manner of triaging and prioritizing patients, level of skill in documenting patients’ health status, measuring and recording patients’ vital signs, quick and accurate evaluation of patients’ conditions, manner of responding to the questions of patients and their companions, and observing work discipline. The researchers also monitored the triage nurses’ capacity for managing the situation and remaining calm at critical times when the triage unit was overcrowded. In the quantitative phase, subjects were selected via convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria for the triage nurses were having a bachelor’s degree in nursing and at least 1 year of professional practice. The exclusion criteria were incomplete answers on the questionnaire and having mental or cognitive disorders. (Table 1) shows the demographics of the participants for qualitative and quantitative phases.
机译:在研究的定性阶段,根据有目的采样和纳入标准选择受试者。使用个人访谈收集数据,焦点访谈和观察。因此,24项深入的半结构化访谈,其中20名护士(18分术护士和两家街头护士),两个普通从业者和两位紧急医学专家面对面地进行了面对面。此外,两名焦点面试会议与一组五次分类护士举行,研究员观察了48小时的分类。纳入工作人员的纳入标准在护理学士学位和至​​少1年的专业实践中;紧急医生必须至少是一般从业者(GP),并在分类中拥有6个月的工作经验。只有在愿意参加这项研究时,才会包括所有护士和医生。排除标准在身体上或情绪上适合参与并具有精神或认知障碍。每个接受采访持续了大约60到90分钟,每个焦点组面试持续了大约90到120分钟。所有访谈都在医院会议大厅进行。为了确保在访谈期间讨论了该研究的主要科目,研究人员设计并使用了面试表格:表格的第一部分涉及参与者的人口统计,第二部分是面试指南。该指南表示,参与者应分享他们在分类中的能力的观点和经验。如果参与者发现能力含糊不清的概念,则提供了解释。在每次采访的开始时,在该研究的目标被解释后,有一些关于受访者的工作经验,教育等的描述性问题。随后,提出了与研究主题有关的问题,例如, “根据您的经验,分类护士拥有的功能是什么?”和“作为一个分类护士,你有过经验,让你觉得你在分类护士中拥有必要的能力吗?此外,为了增加参与者提供的信息的清晰度,研究人员包括后续问题,例如后续问题。 “你能进一步解释一下吗? “那是什么意思?,”你能举个例子或分享你的经历吗?“总体而言,在本研究中进行了12个观察会(48小时)。每个会议持续4小时,所有工作班次都包含在申请中。分类护士的所有口头和非言语沟通及其与患者及其同伴的互动方式,他们的同事以及紧急医生以及他们的合作和参与团队合作,并完全按照自己录制。此外,研究人员观察并记录了护士的三环和优先考虑患者的方式,记录患者健康状况的技能水平,测量和记录患者的生命体征,快速准确地评估患者的病症,响应的方式患者及其同伴的问题,观察工作纪律。研究人员还监测了分类护士的能力,以便在分类单位过度拥挤时在关键时期仍然存在平静。在定量阶段,通过方便采样选择受试者。纳入护士的纳入标准在护理学士学位和至​​少1年的专业实践中具有学士学位。排斥标准对调查问卷并具有精神或认知障碍的答案是不完整的。 (表1)显示了与定性和定量阶段参与者的人口统计统计数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号