首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Human Experimentation in Public Schools: How Schools Served as Sites of Vaccine Trials in the 20th Century
【2h】

Human Experimentation in Public Schools: How Schools Served as Sites of Vaccine Trials in the 20th Century

机译:公立学校的人类实验:学校如何担任20世纪疫苗试验的遗址

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Schools have long been critical partners for public health authorities in achieving widespread vaccination. In the mid-20th century, however, public schools also served as sites of large-scale experiments on novel vaccines. Through examining the experimental diphtheria, polio, and measles vaccine trials, I explored the implications of using schools in this manner, as well as the continuities and discontinuities among the three cases. Common to all of them was that the use of schools brought decision-making into the public sphere, subjecting parents to social pressures and the influences of school officials and community members. However, the effects of using schools varied as well, as their social and institutional significance interacted differently with the narratives surrounding each disease, the public’s changing perception of medicine and science, and society’s changing values. These insights show not only the power of public institutions to influence opinions and perceptions, but also the subtle forces that one’s authority figures, peers, and community members may bring to a seemingly private decision-making process. These considerations are relevant to health interventions today, such as the complex debate over community consent in global health research. (Am J Public Health. 2018;108:1015–1022. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304423)
机译:学校长期以来一直是公共卫生当局实现广泛疫苗的关键伙伴。然而,在20世纪中期,公立学校也担任新型疫苗的大规模实验的网站。通过检查实验性白喉,脊髓灰质炎和麻疹疫苗试验,我探讨了学校以这种方式的影响,以及三种情况下的连续性和不连续性。对所有人共同的是,使用学校将决策带入公共领域,使父母感受到社会压力以及学校官员和社区成员的影响。然而,使用学校的影响也各种各样地,因为他们的社会和制度意义与各疾病周围的叙述不同,公众不断变化的医学和科学感官,社会的变化价值观。这些见解不仅展示了公共机构的力量,以影响意见和看法,也是一个人的权威人物,同行和社区成员可能带来看似私立决策过程的微妙力量。这些考虑与今天的健康干预措施有关,例如全球卫生研究中社会同意的复杂辩论。 (J公共卫生。2018; 108:1015-1022。DOI:10.2105 / AJPH.2018.304423)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号