首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Nutrition >Vitamin D in Breastfed Infants: Systematic Review of Alternatives to Daily Supplementation
【2h】

Vitamin D in Breastfed Infants: Systematic Review of Alternatives to Daily Supplementation

机译:母乳喂养婴儿的维生素D:系统评论每日补充的替代品

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Daily oral vitamin D supplementation (400 IU) is recommended for breastfeeding infants (≤1 y). Recent studies have examined alternative approaches to preventing vitamin D deficiency in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effects of maternal postpartum (M-PP) or infant intermittent (I-INT) vitamin D supplementation on infant 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in comparison to routine direct infant daily (I-D) oral supplementation (400 IU). MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2018. Inclusion criteria consisted of published, peer-reviewed, vitamin D intervention trials involving lactating women and/or exclusively or partially breastfed term infants. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics (e.g., sample size, intervention dose, and duration and mode of administration) and related biochemical and clinical outcomes. Of 28 included trials, 5 randomized controlled trials were incorporated in meta-analyses examining infant 25(OH)D. Overall, M-PP supplementation resulted in modestly lower infant 25(OH)D compared with I-D supplementation (weighted mean difference = −8.1 nmol/L; 95% CI: −15.4, −0.9; I2 = 45%; P = 0.14; 3 trials), but the 2 most recent trials found M-PP to achieve similar infant 25(OH)D as I-D. Comparison of I-INT with I-D was confined to 2 trials with contradictory findings, and it was considered inappropriate for pooled analysis. Meta-analysis was therefore limited by a small number of eligible trials with variable quality of analytically derived 25(OH)D data and inconsistent reporting of safety outcomes, including effects on calcium homeostasis. Considering all 28 included trials, this systematic review highlights M-PP and I-INT regimens as plausible substitutes for routine daily infant vitamin D supplementation, but evidence remains too weak to support a policy update. Dose-ranging, adequately powered trials are required to establish the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of alternative strategies to prevent vitamin D deficiency in breastfeeding infants. This review was registered with PROSPERO as CRD42017069905.
机译:每日口服维生素d补充(400 IU)被推荐用于母乳喂养的婴儿(≤1Y)。最近的研究探讨了替代方法来预防维生素d缺乏症在这个人口。该系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是估计对婴儿25-羟基d产妇产后(M-PP)或婴儿间歇(I-INT)维生素d补充的效果[25(OH)d]浓度相比于常规的直接婴儿每日(ID)口服补充(400 IU)。 MEDLINE,MEDLINE进程内,文摘,系统评价的科克伦数据库,对照试验的科克伦中央登记册进行了全面搜查达至十二月2018年入选标准包括出版,同行评审,维生素d干预涉及哺乳期妇女及试验/或完全或部分母乳喂养的早产儿。两个评价者独立提取的研究特性(例如,样本大小,干预剂量和持续时间和施用模式)和相关的生物化学和临床结果。 28项纳入研究的,5个随机对照试验的荟萃分析检查婴儿25(OH)d被并入。总体而言,M-PP的补充导致在温和降低婴儿25(OH)d与ID补充(比较加权平均差异= -8.1 nmol / L的; 95%CI:-15.4,-0.9; I2 = 45%; P = 0.14; 3个试验),但2次最近的试验中发现M-PP以实现类似的婴儿25(OH)d为ID。对比I-INT与I-d只限于2周的试验与矛盾的结果,它被认为是不恰当的汇总分析。因此荟萃分析由少数与分析衍生的25(OH)d数据的可变的质量和安全性结果的不一致的报告,包括对钙体内平衡的影响合格试验的限制。考虑到所有28次纳入试验,该系统评价亮点M-PP和I-INT化疗方案为每天例行的维生素婴幼儿补充d合理的替代品,但证据仍然太弱,以支持政策的更新。剂量范围,需要适当地供电的试验来确定的有效性,安全性和替代性策略来预防维生素d缺乏在母乳喂养婴儿的可行性。本次审查与PROSPERO为CRD42017069905注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号