首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Discrimination of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Burned Petroleum-Derived Substrates by Using HS-MS eNose and Chemometrics
【2h】

Discrimination of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Burned Petroleum-Derived Substrates by Using HS-MS eNose and Chemometrics

机译:用HS-MS Enose和Chemometics辨别燃烧石油衍生的基材中可燃液残留物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Interpretation of data from fire debris is considered as one of the most challenging steps in fire investigation. Forensic analysts are tasked to identify the presence or absence of ignitable liquid residues (ILRs) which may indicate whether a fire was started deliberately. So far, data analysis is subjected to human interpretation following the American Society for Testing and Materials’ guidelines (ASTM E1618) based on gas chromatography–mass spectrometry data. However, different factors such as interfering pyrolysis compounds may hinder the interpretation of data. Some substrates release compounds that are in the range of common ignitable liquids, which interferes with accurate determination of ILRs. The aim of the current research is to investigate whether headspace–mass spectroscopy electronic nose (HS-MS eNose) combined with pattern recognition can be used to classify different ILRs from fire debris samples that contain a complex matrix (petroleum-based substrates or synthetic fibers carpet) that can strongly interfere with their identification. Six different substrates—four petroleum-derived substrates (vinyl, linoleum, polyester, and polyamide carpet), as well as two different materials for comparison purposes (cotton and cork) were used to investigate background interferences. Gasoline, diesel, ethanol, and charcoal starter with kerosene were used as ignitable liquids. In addition, fire debris samples were taken after different elapsed times. A total of 360 fire debris samples were analyzed. The obtained total ion mass spectrum was combined with unsupervised exploratory techniques such as hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) as well as supervised linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The results from HCA show a strong tendency to group the samples according to the ILs and substrate used, and LDA allowed for a full identification and discrimination of every ILR regardless of the substrate.
机译:解释来自火灾碎片的数据被认为是火灾调查中最具挑战性的步骤之一。法医分析师是识别可点燃液体残留(ILRS)的存在或不存在,这可能表明是否故意启动火灾。到目前为止,根据气相色谱 - 质谱数据,美国社会对美国学会(ASTM E1618)之后,数据分析受到人类解释。然而,不同的因素如干扰热解化合物可能会阻碍数据的解释。一些底物释放化合物,其在常见的可燃液体范围内,其干扰了ILR的精确测定。目前的研究的目的是研究头部质谱电子鼻子(HS-MS ENEOSE)是否与图案识别结合的是可用于从含有复杂基质的火碎片样品(基于石油基基材或合成纤维)的火碎片样品分类不同的ILR地毯)可以强烈干扰他们的身份证明。六种不同的基材 - 四种石油衍生的基材(乙烯基,油炸素,聚酯和聚酰胺地毯),以及用于比较目的的两种不同的材料(棉花和软木塞)来研究背景干扰。汽油,柴油,乙醇和木炭起动器用煤油用作可燃液体。此外,在不同的经过时间后取出火碎片样品。分析了总共360个火碎片样品。将得到的总离子质谱与无监督的探索技术组合,例如分层聚类分析(HCA)以及监督的线性判别分析(LDA)。 HCA的结果表明,根据所使用的ILS和基材对样品进行强烈的趋势,并且LDA无论基材如何完全识别和辨别每个ILR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号