首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure
【2h】

Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure

机译:一线FOLFIRINOX失败后无法切除的晚期胰腺癌患者的二线吉西他滨联合Nab-紫杉醇治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

FOLFIRINOX (FX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been reported as effective regimens for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). FX may be more effective but is also associated with more adverse events (AEs). Therefore, first-line treatment with FX followed by second-line GnP may be appropriate. Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of second-line GnP for patients with APC after first-line FX failure. Methods: This study was a multicenter prospective phase II study evaluating second-line GnP in patients with APC after failed first-line FX. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the frequency and degree of adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty patients (14 male; median age, 64 years) were enrolled. The RR was 13.3%, with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months. The median OS and PFS were 7.6 and 3.8 months, respectively. From the beginning of first-line treatment, the median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 70% of patients. Conclusion: Second-line GnP after FX failure for patients with APC could be more effective than GEM alone. Further comparison studies are warranted.
机译:FOLFIRINOX(FX)和吉西他滨(GEM)加上nab-紫杉醇(GnP)已被报道作为不可切除的晚期胰腺癌(APC)的有效方案。 FX可能更有效,但也与更多不良事件(AE)相关。因此,用FX进行一线治疗,然后再进行GnP二线治疗可能是合适的。目的:评估一线FX衰竭后二线GnP对APC患者的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究是一项多中心前瞻性II期研究,评估一线FX失败后APC患者的二线GnP。主要终点为缓解率(RR),次要终点为总体生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS)以及不良事件的发生频率和程度(AE)。结果:招募了30例患者(男14例;中位年龄64岁)。 RR为13.3%,中位随访时间为9.3个月。 OS和PFS的中位数分别为7.6个月和3.8个月。从一线治疗开始,中位OS​​和PFS分别为14.2和9.3个月。 70%的患者可见3或4级AE。结论:FX失败后的二线GnP对APC患者可能比单独的GEM更有效。必须进行进一步的比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号