首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nanomaterials >Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials as Valuable Sources of Anti-Leishmanial Agents: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials as Valuable Sources of Anti-Leishmanial Agents: A Systematic Review

机译:基于壳聚糖的纳米材料作为抗莱山代理商的有价值的来源:系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The current chemotherapy agents against various forms of leishmaniasis have some problems and side effects, including high toxicity, high cost, and the emergence of resistant strains. Here, we aimed to review the preclinical studies (in vitro and in vivo) on the anti-leishmanial activity of chitosan and chitosan-based particles against Leishmania spp. Methods: This study was conducted based on the 06-PRISMA guidelines and registered in the CAMARADES-NC3Rs Preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Facility (SyRF) database. Various English databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were used to find the publications related to the anti-leishmanial effects of chitosan and its derivatives and other pharmaceutical formulations, without a date limitation, to find all the published articles. The keywords included “chitosan”, “chitosan nanoparticles”, “anti-leishmanial”, “Leishmania”, “leishmaniasis”, “cutaneous leishmaniasis”, “visceral leishmaniasis”, “in vitro”, and “in vivo”. The language for data collection were limited to English. Results: Of 2669 papers, 25 papers, including 7 in vitro (28.0%), 7 in vivo (28.0%), and 11 in vitro/in vivo (44.0%) studies conducted up to 2020 met the inclusion criteria for discussion in this systematic review. The most common species of Leishmania used in these studies were L. major (12, 48.0%), L. donovani (7, 28.0%), and L. amazonensis (4, 16.80%). In vivo, the most used animals were BALB/c mice (11, 61.1%) followed by hamsters (6, 33.3%) and Wistar rats (1, 5.5%), respectively. In vitro, the most used Leishmania form was amastigote (8, 44.4%), followed by promastigote (4, 22.2%), and both forms promastigote/amastigote (6, 33.3%). Conclusion: According to the literature, different types of drugs based on chitosan and their derivatives demonstrated considerable in vitro and in vivo anti-leishmanial activity against various Leishmania spp. Based on the findings of this review study, chitosan and its derivatives could be considered as an alternative and complementary source of valuable components against leishmaniasis with a high safety index. Nevertheless, more investigations are required to elaborate on this result, mainly in clinical settings.
机译:背景:目前对各种形式的LeishManiaisis的化疗剂具有一些问题和副作用,包括高毒性,高成本和抗性菌株的出现。在这里,我们旨在审查对壳聚糖和壳聚糖基颗粒的抗利尿和体内活动的临床前研究(体外和体内)对抗Leishmania SPP。方法:本研究是基于06-PRISMA指南进行的,并在CAMARS-NC3RS临床前系统审查和META分析设施(SYRF)数据库中登记。各种英语数据库,如PubMed,Google Scholar,Science,EBSCO,SciErdirect网页,Scopus,用于找到与壳聚糖及其衍生物和其他药物制剂的抗LeishManial效果有关的出版物,但没有日期限制所有已发表的文章。关键词包括“壳聚糖”,“壳聚糖纳米粒子”,“抗利尔诺”,“莱山西亚”,“Leishmaniaisis”,“皮肤莱山西亚病”,“内脏LeishManiaisis”,“体外”,“体外”,“体内”。数据收集语言仅限于英语。结果:2669篇论文,25篇论文,其中7种体外(28.0%),体内7种(28.0%)和11种体内/体内(44.0%)研究,高达2020次达到普及标准系统审查。这些研究中使用的最常见的Leishmania种类是L.主要(12,48.0%),L. Donovani(7,28.0%)和L.Amazonensis(4,16.80%)。在体内,最常用的动物是Balb / C小鼠(11,61.1%),然后是仓鼠(6,33.3%)和W​​istar大鼠(1,5.5%)。体外,最常用的莱什曼菊属形式是Amastigote(8,44.4%),其次是Promastigote(4,22.2%),两者兼而有之为Promastigote / Amastigote(6,33.3%)。结论:根据文献,基于壳聚糖及其衍生物的不同类型的药物在体外和体内反对各种Leishmania SPP的抗利尿活动中表现得相当大。基于本综述研究的研究结果,壳聚糖及其衍生物可被视为具有高安全指标的利什曼病的替代和互补组成部分。然而,主要在临床环境中阐述这种结果需要更多的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号