首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Personalized Medicine >‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
【2h】

‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research

机译:统计IRREPRODUICIBIBLIBIBLE不具有更大的样本大小:如何量化和解决人类研究中的疾病数据多层性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Poor study reproducibility is a concern in translational research. As a solution, it is recommended to increase sample size (N), i.e., add more subjects to experiments. The goal of this study was to examine/visualize data multimodality (data with >1 data peak/mode) as cause of study irreproducibility. To emulate the repetition of studies and random sampling of study subjects, we first used various simulation methods of random number generation based on preclinical published disease outcome data from human gut microbiota-transplantation rodent studies (e.g., intestinal inflammation and univariate/continuous). We first used unimodal distributions (one-mode, Gaussian, and binomial) to generate random numbers. We showed that increasing N does not reproducibly identify statistical differences when group comparisons are repeatedly simulated. We then used multimodal distributions (>1-modes and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods of random sampling) to simulate similar multimodal datasets A and B (t-test-p = 0.95; N = 100,000), and confirmed that increasing N does not improve the ‘reproducibility of statistical results or direction of the effects’. Data visualization with violin plots of categorical random data simulations with five-integer categories/five-groups illustrated how multimodality leads to irreproducibility. Re-analysis of data from a human clinical trial that used maltodextrin as dietary placebo illustrated multimodal responses between human groups, and after placebo consumption. In conclusion, increasing N does not necessarily ensure reproducible statistical findings across repeated simulations due to randomness and multimodality. Herein, we clarify how to quantify, visualize and address disease data multimodality in research. Data visualization could facilitate study designs focused on disease subtypes/modes to help understand person–person differences and personalized medicine.
机译:糟糕的研究再现性是翻译研究的关注。作为解决方案,建议增加样本大小(N),即添加更多受试者进行实验。本研究的目标是检查/可视化数据多模(具有> 1数据峰/模式的数据)作为研究IRREPRODUCIBLE的原因。为了效仿研究和研究对象的随机抽样的重复,我们首先基于人体肠道微生物植物移植研究(例如肠炎症和单变量/连续)的临床前公布的疾病结果数据使用各种仿真方法。我们首先使用单峰分布(单模,高斯和二项式)来生成随机数。我们表明,当反复模拟群体比较时,增加N不可重复地识别统计差异。然后我们使用多模式分布(> 1-模式和马尔可夫链Monte Carlo的随机采样方法)来模拟类似的多模式数据集A和B(T-Test-P = 0.95; n = 100,000),并确认增加N不会改善'统计结果的再现性或影响方向'。使用五个整数/五组的分类随机数据仿真的小提琴图的数据可视化,示出了多模态如何导致IRREProDucibity。从使用麦芽糖糊精作为膳食安慰剂的人类临床试验中的数据重新分析,以便在安慰剂消费后的多峰反应。总之,由于随机性和多模块,增加N不一定确保反复仿真之间的可重复统计发现。在此,我们阐明了如何量化,可视化和解决研究中的疾病数据多层性。数据可视化可以促进专注于疾病亚型/模式的研究设计,以帮助理解人物差异和个性化医学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号