首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >A Novel Approach for the Assessment of Insulin Potency by Glycemic Monitoring of an Insulin-Dependent Human Cell Line
【2h】

A Novel Approach for the Assessment of Insulin Potency by Glycemic Monitoring of an Insulin-Dependent Human Cell Line

机译:一种新的胰岛素依赖性人体细胞血糖监测评估胰岛素效力的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Insulin therapy for people with diabetes encompasses an enormous number of different choices for formulations of insulin and its analogs.1 For quality assurance of biopharmaceutical products, reliable and validated analytical methods are required. Biological assays play an important role for determining the potency of hormones like insulin in living subjects.2,3 Concerning insulin bioassay requirements, regulations differ especially between European and US pharmacopoeias, where for the latter animal based so-called bioidentity testing assures the potency of insulins.4 The European pharmacopoeia does not demand for a bioidentity test. Their quality assurance is solely based on a high-performance liquid chromatography method quantifying total insulin but not necessarily discriminating from, e.g., misfolded fractions. Recently, a replacement of the US pharmacopoeia “rabbit blood sugar method” by an in vitro cell test has been suggested.5
机译:对糖尿病患者的胰岛素治疗包括胰岛素配方的巨大不同选择,也可以是生物制药产品的质量保证,需要可靠和经过验证的分析方法。生物学测定发挥了确定胰岛素等胰岛素等胰岛素等胰岛素的效力的重要作用.2,3关于胰岛素生物测定要求,规定特别是欧洲和美国药典之间的不同,用于后一种动物所谓的生物智权测试确保了效力Insulins.4欧洲药典不要求生物直觉测试。它们的质量保证仅基于高性能液相色谱法,该方法量化总胰岛素,但不一定鉴别例如错误折叠的分数。最近,已经提出了通过体外细胞试验进行美国药典“兔血糖方法”的替代品.5

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号