A novel and effective method for validation and measurement of output factors for Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ using TRS 483 protocol

摘要

The objective of this work was to identify the exact location of the effective point of measurement (EPM) of four different active detectors to compare the relative collimator output factors (ROF) of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) according to IAEA TRS‐483 recommendations. ROF was measured at the center of the spherical LGK‐Solid Water (LGK‐SW) Phantom for three (4‐, 8‐, and 16‐mm in diameter) collimators using four (PTW‐TN60008, PTW‐TN60016, PTW‐TN60017, and PTW‐60019 diode/diamond) detectors. Since diode detectors have a much smaller sensitive volume than the PTW‐31010 ion chamber used for reference dosimetry, its EPM might not be at the center of the phantom, or (100, 100, 100) of the Leksell Coordinate System, particularly in the z‐direction. Hence for each diode detector, a CBCT image was acquired after it was inserted into the phantom, from which the z‐Leksell coordinate of EPM was determined. Relative collimator output factors was then measured by focusing GK beams on the determined EPM of each diode. Measured ROFs were compared with the vendor‐provided values in GK treatment planning system. For validation, a plan was generated to measure the output of 4‐mm collimator for PTW‐TN60017 at various couch locations along the z‐axis. For PTW‐TN60008, the percentage variations were 0.6 ± 0.4%, and −0.8 ± 0.2% for 4 and 8‐mm collimators, respectively. For PTW‐TN60016, the percentage variations were 0.8 ± 0.0%, and 0.2 ± 0.1%, respectively. The percentage variations were −3.3 ± 0.0% and −0.9 ± 0.1%, respectively, for PTW‐TN60017, and −0.5 ± 0.0% and −0.8 ± 0.2%, respectively, for PTW‐TN60019. Center of the measured profile for PTW‐TN60017 was only 0.1 mm different from that identified using the CBCT. In conclusion, we have developed a simple and effective method to determine the EPMs of diode detectors when inserted into the existing LGK‐SW phantom. With the acquired positional information and using TRS‐483 protocol, good agreements were obtained between the measured ROFs and manufacturer recommended values.