首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact
【2h】

The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact

机译:消费者补贴对车辆和环境影响的绿色技术创新的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the pressure of excessive resource consumption and serious environmental pollution, governments provide various consumer subsidies to promote sales of energy-saving vehicles, including the energy-saving fuel vehicle (FV) and the pure electric vehicle (EV) in the automobile industry. Utilizing a Hotelling model, this paper explores two competing firms’ decisions on the selection of green technology innovations for vehicles, namely producing either the energy-saving FV or the pure EV, while the two vehicles are different from each other on not only the energy-saving level but also the consumer’s acceptance. We further explore the impact of the government’s consumer subsidy on the profits, environment, and consumer surplus. We find that the two competing firms’ equilibrium selections of green technology innovations for vehicles change as the variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV varies. In particular, when the variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV is moderate, the firm with a lower technology capacity for improving the energy-saving level of the FV (i.e., firm 2) will produce the pure EV while the other firm (i.e., firm 1) produces the energy-saving FV, and the converse is not true. In this case, the decreasing variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV will benefit firm 2 and make firm 1 lose in a competing context. In particular, both firms would charge lower retail prices as the variable manufacturing cost of the EV decreases. In addition, we find that although the consumer subsidy could reduce the purchasing cost for the consumer and promote both firms to produce higher energy-saving level vehicles, a firm can still reduce its retail price under certain conditions because of the competition between the two firms. Finally, we prove that the consumer subsidy can be always beneficial to the environment, while it may hurt the consumer surplus and the firms’ profits under certain conditions. The results provide suggestions for governments to adopt an appropriate consumer subsidy program from perspectives of the consumer, environment, and economy.
机译:在资源消费过度的压力和严重的环境污染的压力下,政府提供各种消费者补贴,以促进节能车辆的销售,包括节能燃料车辆(FV)和汽车工业的纯电动汽车(EV)。本文利用热塑模型,探讨了两种竞争公司对车辆的绿色技术创新选择的决定,即生产节能FV或纯粹的EV,而这两个车辆不仅不同于能量。 - 消费水平,但也是消费者的验收。我们进一步探讨了政府消费者补贴对利润,环境和消费者盈余的影响。我们发现,随着纯粹的ev的变量制造成本变化,这两家竞争公司的绿色技术创新的均衡选择改变。特别是,当纯粹的EV的变量制造成本中等时,该公司具有较低的技术能力,用于提高FV的节能水平(即,公司2)将在另一家公司(即,公司1)生产节能FV,并且逆转不是真的。在这种情况下,纯粹的EV的可变制造成本降低将使公司2受益,并使公司1在竞争环境中失败。特别是,随着EV的变量制造成本减少,两家公司都将收取较低的零售价格。此外,我们发现,尽管消费者补贴可以降低消费者的购买成本,并促进两家公司生产更高节能的水平车辆,但由于两家公司之间的竞争,一家公司仍然可以降低零售价格。 。最后,我们证明了消费者补贴可以始终有利于环境,而在某些条件下可能会损害消费者盈余和公司的利润。结果为各国政府提供了从消费者,环境和经济的观点采用适当的消费者补贴计划的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号