首页> 外文OA文献 >The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact
【2h】

The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact

机译:消费者补贴对车辆和环境影响的绿色技术创新的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the pressure of excessive resource consumption and serious environmental pollution, governments provide various consumer subsidies to promote sales of energy-saving vehicles, including the energy-saving fuel vehicle (FV) and the pure electric vehicle (EV) in the automobile industry. Utilizing a Hotelling model, this paper explores two competing firms’ decisions on the selection of green technology innovations for vehicles, namely producing either the energy-saving FV or the pure EV, while the two vehicles are different from each other on not only the energy-saving level but also the consumer’s acceptance. We further explore the impact of the government’s consumer subsidy on the profits, environment, and consumer surplus. We find that the two competing firms’ equilibrium selections of green technology innovations for vehicles change as the variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV varies. In particular, when the variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV is moderate, the firm with a lower technology capacity for improving the energy-saving level of the FV (i.e., firm 2) will produce the pure EV while the other firm (i.e., firm 1) produces the energy-saving FV, and the converse is not true. In this case, the decreasing variable manufacturing cost of the pure EV will benefit firm 2 and make firm 1 lose in a competing context. In particular, both firms would charge lower retail prices as the variable manufacturing cost of the EV decreases. In addition, we find that although the consumer subsidy could reduce the purchasing cost for the consumer and promote both firms to produce higher energy-saving level vehicles, a firm can still reduce its retail price under certain conditions because of the competition between the two firms. Finally, we prove that the consumer subsidy can be always beneficial to the environment, while it may hurt the consumer surplus and the firms’ profits under certain conditions. The results provide suggestions for governments to adopt an appropriate consumer subsidy program from perspectives of the consumer, environment, and economy.
机译:在过度的资源消耗和环境污染严重的压力,政府提供各种消费补贴销售推广节能汽车,包括节能型燃料汽车(FV)和汽车行业的纯电动车(EV)的。利用霍特林模型,本文探讨了两种相互竞争的企业对绿色技术创新的车辆,即产生选择决定无论是FV或纯电动汽车,而两台车相互不仅能不同的节能-saving水平,而且消费者的认可。我们进一步探讨了政府的补贴消费者对利润,环境和消费者剩余的影响。我们发现,这两个相互竞争的公司的绿色技术创新对车辆平衡的选择更改为纯电动汽车的可变生产成本变化。特别是,当纯EV的可变制造成本适中,商行具有较低的技术能力提高FV的节能级别(即,企业2)将产生,而另一个公司的纯EV(即公司1)生产的节能FV,而反之则不然。在这种情况下,纯电动汽车的减少可变生产成本将有利于公司2,使企业1失去竞争环境。特别是,由于电动车的可变生产成本降低两家公司将收取较低的零售价格。此外,我们发现,虽然消费者的补贴可能降低消费者的购买成本,促进双方企业产生更高节能水平的车辆,企业仍可以减少下,因为两家公司之间的竞争一定条件下它的零售价格。最后,我们证明了消费者补贴可以随时对环境有益,虽然它可能伤害了消费者剩余和一定条件下企业的利润。研究结果为政府采取从消费者,环境和经济的角度适当的消费补贴计划的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号