首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Productivity Effect Evaluation on Market-Type Environmental Regulation: A Case Study of SO
【2h】

Productivity Effect Evaluation on Market-Type Environmental Regulation: A Case Study of SO

机译:市场型环境监管的生产力效果评估 - 以案例为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Taking China’s SO2 emissions trading pilot (ETP) in 2007, a large-scale market-based environmental regulation as its target, this paper reexamines the strong Porter hypothesis by adopting the method of propensity score matching-differences-in-differences. Research shows the following results: first, SO2 ETP which provides high flexibility for enterprises in the process of emission reduction, improves total factor productivity (TFP) significantly on the whole. Second, the productivity effect of market-based environmental regulation varies from the productivity level of enterprise. For example, the SO2 ETP has a significant effect on TFP only at 40–80 percent quantile of TFP, and the effect increases at first and then decreases. Third, the financing constraints and bargaining power of enterprises have significant negative moderating effects on the impact of SO2 ETP on TFP, and the moderating effects between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises exist heterogeneity. In conclusion, it provides reference for the formulation of market-type environmental regulations and the realization of high-quality development for developing countries.
机译:2007年以中国的SO2排放交易飞行员(ETP)为目标,将大规模的市场环境监管为目标,通过采用倾向分数差异差异的方法来重新审视强烈的波特假设。研究显示以下结果:首先,SO2 ETP为在减排过程中为企业提供高度灵活性,整体提高了总因素生产率(TFP)。其次,基于市场的环境监管的生产力效果因企业生产力水平而异。例如,SO2 ETP对TFP仅为TFP的40-80%略微效果,并且效果首先增加,然后减少。第三,企业的融资限制和讨价还价权对SO2 ETP对TFP的影响具有显着的负面调节作用,国有和非国有企业之间的调节效应存在异质性。总之,它为市场型环境法规的制定和实现发展中国家的高质量发展提供了参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号