首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >Equal Protection? Differential Effects of Religious Attendance on Black-White Older Adult Mortality
【2h】

Equal Protection? Differential Effects of Religious Attendance on Black-White Older Adult Mortality

机译:平等保护?宗教考勤对黑白老年成年死亡率的差异影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social determinants of later life population health are “the circumstances in which we are born, grow up, live, work, and age” usually identified as power and status determinants: income, wealth, and education. Although rarely considered a social determinant of health, religious social ties are a familiar “circumstance” for many older persons, and there is considerable evidence linking religious attendance to all-cause mortality. There are race differences in both religiosity and mortality patterns: Black Americans show higher levels of both religious attendance and mortality compared with white Americans. This raises the question of equal protection of religious attendance: Is the protective effect of religious attendance on mortality weaker, stronger, or the same for whites and African Americans? The analysis employs 10-year longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study, 2004-2014 (N=18,346). In stratified models, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and health, African Americans have a hazard ratio (HR) for frequent attendance at services that is more protective than for whites: .48 (95%CI: .35, .67) compared with .61 (95%CI: .53, .70). Health behaviors mediate 19% of the effect for blacks and 26% for whites; other social ties mediate 12.5% of the effect for blacks and 7% for whites. An interaction test shows a more protective effect of frequent attendance for blacks compared with whites (p<.000). Religious attendance may be more beneficial for African Americans who are multiply disadvantaged with respect to other social determinants of health. The mediation patterns also suggest that the mechanisms of effect for blacks and whites may differ.
机译:后期生活人口健康的社会决定因素是“我们出生,长大,生活,工作和年龄”通常被确定为权力和地位决定因素:收入,财富和教育。虽然很少被认为是健康的社会决定因素,但宗教社会关系是许多老年人的熟悉的“环境”,并且有相当大的证据证明宗教出席对所有导致死亡率。宗教和死亡率模式都存在种族差异:与白人美国人相比,黑人美国人表现出宗教出勤率和死亡率更高。这提出了平等保护宗教出勤问题:宗教出勤对死亡率的保护作用较弱,更强大,或者是白人和非裔美国人的影响吗?分析采用了来自健康和退休研究的10年纵向数据,2004 - 2014年(n = 18,346)。在分层模型中,在调整社会监测因素和健康之后,非洲裔美国人的危险比(HR)频繁出席的服务比Whites更具保护性:.48(95%CI:.35,.67)。 61(95%CI:.53,.70)。健康行为调解19%的黑人效果,26%的白人;其他社会关系中介12.5%的黑人效果,为白人的7%。与白人相比,相互作用试验显示了频繁出勤的保护效果(P <.000)。宗教出席可能对与其他健康其他社会决定因素相比的非洲裔美国人更有益。调解模式还表明,黑人和白人的效果机制可能不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号