首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >The Influence of Multiple Frailties on Institutionalization and Mortality in Community-Living Older Adults
【2h】

The Influence of Multiple Frailties on Institutionalization and Mortality in Community-Living Older Adults

机译:多次虚弱对社区生活老年人制度化和死亡的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Frailty is a hallmark of accelerated aging, predisposing the older person to increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. Physical frailty is closely linked to other health dimensions, such as cognitive, psychological, and social functions. This study aims to examine the influence of multiple dimensions of frailty in predicting institutionalization and mortality. A nationally representative sample of Koreans 65 years or older from the Living Profiles of Older People Survey in 2008 was followed up for three years (n = 11,265). Physical frailty was defined as being prefrail or frail using the Fried phenotype model. Those with cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms, and social vulnerabilities, in addition to physical frailty, were considered to have cognitive frailty, psychological frailty, and social frailty, respectively. The proportional hazards model was used to analyze the risk of institutionalization and mortality by the total number and different combinations of frailties, adjusting for covariates. More than half (50.1%) of the participants exhibited multiple frailties, with 8.1% concurrently displaying frailty in all four domains (mixed frailty). The risk of adverse outcomes was elevated with a higher number of frailties, with hazard ratios of 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52, 4.42) for institutionalization and 3.40 (95% CI: 2.50, 4.63) for mortality among those presenting mixed frailty. Whereas psychological frailty demonstrated a stronger predictive ability of mortality than institutionalization, the reverse was observed for social frailty. Multiple frailties are prevalent in late life. Acquiring more frailties raises the risk of adverse outcomes, with varying effects according to multidimensional frailty profiles.
机译:脆弱是加速老龄化的标志,使老年人提高对不良健康结果的脆弱性。物理脆弱与其他健康尺寸紧密相关,如认知,心理和社会功能。本研究旨在审查脆弱维度在预测制度化和死亡率方面的影响。从2008年老年人调查的生活档案65岁或以上的全国代表性样本随访了三年(n = 11,265)。物理脆弱被定义为使用炒表型模型预制或脆弱。除了物理脆弱之外,还有认知障碍,抑郁症状和社会漏洞的人被认为分别具有认知的体力,心理脆弱和社会脆弱。比例危险模型用于分析制度化和死亡率的风险,通过脆弱的总数和不同组合,调整协变量。超过一半的参与者展现了多次脆弱的脆弱,在所有四个域名(混合体力)中同时显示脆弱。不良结果的风险升高,较少的脆弱性升高,危险比为2.59(95%置信区间[CI]:1.52,4.42),用于制度化,3.40(95%CI:2.50,4.63)在提前的死亡率混合脆弱。虽然心理脆弱表现出比制度化更强的预测性的死亡能力,但逆转被观察到社会脆弱。在后期生活中,多个脆弱是普遍的。获取更多的脆弱是提高了不利结果的风险,根据多维脆弱型材的不同效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号