首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heliyon >Assessment of soil health parameters and application of the sustainability index to fields under conservation agriculture for 3 6 and 9 years in India
【2h】

Assessment of soil health parameters and application of the sustainability index to fields under conservation agriculture for 3 6 and 9 years in India

机译:评估土壤健康参数和可持续性指数在印度保护农业保护区的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effect of duration of conservation agriculture adoption on soil carbon dynamics and system sustainability was evaluated on farms of 30 villages in the Nilokheri block of Karnal district, Haryana, India. Sustainability was evaluated, in which a number of soil physical, chemical, and biological parameters were measured and a Sustainability Index (SI) was applied. Soil samples were collected from existing conservation agriculture (CA) and conventional tillage (CT) farms. Villages under CA practices were subdivided as CA3, CA6, and CA9 based on the number of years of CA practice adoption. Results showed that bulk density (BD) of 0-15 cm soil depth was 7% greater in CA3 plots, whereas in CA6 and CA9 plots BD values were only 2% and 3% higher than CT. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in 0-15 cm soil depth was found to be greater by 16.32% in CA3 than CT plots, whereas SOC was higher by 38.77% and 61.22% in CA6 and CA9. In CA, for the 0–15 and 15-30 cm soil depths, labile pools were 36% and 22% greater than CT, respectively. For both the soil depths in CA, the recalcitrant pool was 12% and 9% more than CT, respectively. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) values of the 0-15 cm soil depth were increased over CT by 18.57%, 47.08%, and 71.5% for CA3, CA6, and CA9 respectively. In CA plots, the SI of 0-15 cm soil depth ranged between cumulative ratings (CR) of 18–21, which indicates that CA practice is “sustainable” for both soil depths. For CT, CR ranged from 25 to 30 for both soil depths resulting in a SI of “sustainability with high input”. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) scores showed that SOC had the maximum weight (0.96) towards sustainability, giving it a rank of 1. Effective rooting depth (ERD), BD, texture, and wilting point (WP) ranked 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively, indicating their corresponding weight of contribution towards the SI. Farmers in the Karnal district should be encouraged to adopt CA practices as they can increase SOC and move the systems from “sustainable with high input” to “sustainable”.
机译:在印度哈里亚纳邦喀尔兰区尼洛赫块的30个村庄农场评估了保护农业持续时间对土壤碳动力学和系统可持续性的影响。评估可持续性,其中测量了许多土壤物理,化学品和生物学参数,并施加可持续性指数(Si)。从现有的保护性农业(CA)和常规耕作(CT)农场收集土壤样品。基于CA练习采用多年的多年来,CA惯例下的村庄被细分为CA3,CA6和CA9。结果表明,在CA3图中,0-15cm土壤深度的堆积密度(BD)为7%,而在CA6和CA9绘制中,BD值仅为2%和3%高于CT。在0-15厘米的土壤中的土壤有机碳(SoC)在Ca 3中发现比CT图更大为16.32%,而SOC在CA6和CA9中较高38.77%和61.22%。在CA,对于0-15和15-30厘米的土壤深度,不稳定池分别比CT分别为36%和22%。对于Ca中的土壤深度,核批许池分别比CT分别为12%和9%。微生物生物质碳(MBC)0-15cm的土壤深度的值分别在CT的CT上增加18.57%,47.08%和71.5%,分别适用于CA3,CA6和CA9。在CA图中,0-15厘米的土壤深度的SI在18-21的累积额定值(CR)之间,这表明CA实践是两种土壤深度的“可持续”。对于CT,对于两种土壤深度而言,Cr的范围为25至30,导致“高输入可持续性”的SI。通过相似性与理想解决方案(TOPSIS)分数的顺序优先技术表明,SOC的可持续性最大(0.96),使其成为1.有效生根深度(ERD),BD,纹理和WILTING点(WP)。排名2,3,4和5,分别表示它们对Si的相应贡献重量。应鼓励Karnal区的农民通过CA练习,因为它们可以增加SOC,并将系统从“可持续高投入”中移动到“可持续”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号