首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Geriatrics >Title Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Seniors: Differences between American Geriatrics Society and STOPP Criteria and Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions
【2h】

Title Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Seniors: Differences between American Geriatrics Society and STOPP Criteria and Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions

机译:标题评估前辈潜在的药物:美国老年学会与停止标准之间的差异并防止药物不良反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Key problems for seniors are their exposure to “potentially inappropriate medications” and “potential medication omissions”, which place them at risk for moderate, severe, or fatal adverse drug reactions. This study of 82,935 first admissions to acute care hospitals in Calgary during 2013–2018 identified 294,160 Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions (STOPP) potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) (3.55/patient), 226,970 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers PIMs (2.74/patient), 59,396 START potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) (0.72/patient), and 85,288 STOPP PPOs (1.03/patient) for which a new prescription corrected the omission. This represents an overwhelming workload to prevent inappropriate prescriptions continuing during the hospitalisation and then deprescribe them judiciously. Limiting scrutiny to the most frequent PIMs and PPOs will identify many moderate, severe, or fatal risks of causing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) but to identify all PIMs or PPO involving moderate or severe risks of ADRs also involves searching lower in the frequency list of patients. Deciding whether to use the STOPP or AGS Beers PIM lists is an important issue in searching for ADRs, because the Pearson correlation coefficient for agreement between the STOPP and AGS Beers PIM totals in this study was 0.7051 (95% CI 0.7016 to 0.7085; p < 0.001). The combined lists include 289 individual PIM medications but STOPP and AGS have only 159 (55%) in common. The AGS Beers lists include medications used in the US and STOPP/START those used in Europe. The AGS authors recommend using both criteria. The ideal solution to the problem is to implement carefully constructed Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) as in the SENATOR trial, then for an experienced pharmacist to focus on the key PIMs and PPOs likely to lead to moderate, severe, or fatal ADRs. The pharmacist and key decision makers on the services need to establish a collegial relationship to discuss frequently changing the medications that place the patients at risk. Then, the remaining PIMs and PPOs that relate to chronic disease management can be discussed by phone with the family physician using the discharge summary, which lists the medications for potential deprescribing.
机译:老年人的关键问题是暴露于“潜在的不恰当药物”和“潜在的药物疏忽”,将它们视为中度,严重或致命不良药物的风险。本研究在2013 - 2018年Calgary急性护理医院的第一个录取了82,935次录取了294,160个老年人处方的筛查工具(停止)可能不适当的药物(PIMS)(3.55 /患者),226,970名美国老年人(AGS)BEERS PIMS(2.74 /患者),59,396个启动潜在规定遗漏(PPO)(0.72 /患者)和85,288个STOPP PPO(1.03 /患者),其中一个新的处方纠正了遗漏。这代表了一个压倒性的工作量,以防止在住院期间继续不适当的处方,然后明智地剥夺他们。限制对最常见的PIMS和PPO的审查将识别出现不良药物反应(ADR)的许多中等,严重或致命的风险,而是识别涉及ADR的中等或严重风险的所有PIMS或PPO也涉及在频率列表中搜索下降耐心。决定是否使用STOPP或AGS BEERS PIM列表是寻找ADRS的一个重要问题,因为STOPP和AGS BEERES PIM在本研究中的PEARSON相关系数为0.7051(95%CI 0.7016至0.7085; P < 0.001)。合并的列表包括289个单独的PIM药物,但Stopp和AGS只有159(55%)共同。 AGS BEERS列表包括美国使用的药物和欧洲使用的STOPP /开始。 AGS Authors建议使用两个标准。问题的理想解决方案是在参议员试验中实施仔细构造的临床决策支持系统(CDS),然后为经验丰富的药剂师专注于关键PIM和PPO,可能导致中度,严重或致命的ADR。药剂师和关键决策者对服务需要建立一个合唱关系,以讨论经常改变患者面临风险的药物。然后,可以通过使用放电摘要,通过电话与家庭医生讨论与慢性疾病管理有关的剩余PIMS和PPO,该概述列出了潜在贬低的药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号