首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dentistry Journal >Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
【2h】

Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms

机译:LGG综合实验性口腔生物膜对漱口水作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to investigate the effects of mouthwashes on oral biofilms with probiotics, we compared in biofilms the susceptibility to mouthwashes of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Candida albicans. We also evaluated these pathogens’ susceptibility to the mouthwashes and their recovery after mouthwash-rinsing in biofilms with/without LGG. First, 1-day-/3-day-old LGG-integrated multi-species biofilms were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, essential oils, or amine fluoride/stannous fluoride. Cells were plate-counted and relative survival rates (RSRs) of LGG and pathogens calculated. Second, 1-day-/3-day-old multispecies biofilms with and without LGG were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes; cells were plate-counted and the pathogens’ RSRs were calculated. Third, 1-day-old biofilms were treated for 1 min with mouthwashes. Cells were plate-counted immediately and after 2-day cultivation. Recovery rates of pathogens were calculated and compared between biofilms with/without LGG. Live/Dead® staining served for structural analyses. Our results showed that RSRs of LGG were insignificantly smaller than those of pathogens in both 1-day and 3-day biofilms. No significant differences appeared in pathogens’ RSRs and recovery rates after treatment between biofilms with/without LGG. To conclude, biofilm LGG was susceptible to the mouthwashes; but biofilm LGG altered neither the mouthwash effects on oral pathogens nor affected their recovery.
机译:为了探讨漱口水在益生菌中漱口水的影响,我们将在生物膜中与百发症液体乳菌菌腐烂的腐蚀性乳菌(LGG)和口服病原体链球菌,链球菌血清和念珠菌念珠菌。我们还评估了这些病原体对漱口水的易感性及其在生物膜中的漱口水后恢复的易感性,其与/没有LGG。首先,将1天/三天历史的LGG集成的多物质生物膜暴露在含有氯己定,精油或氟化物/亚砷化物/氟化物的漱口水中。细胞是板计数的且相对存活率(RSR)的LGG和病原体。其次,1天/ 3天历史的多数多层,具有和不含LGG的生物膜1分钟漱口;细胞被平板计数,并计算病原体的RSR。第三,用漱口水处理1日历史的生物膜1分钟。细胞立即均等,培养2天后。计算患者的恢复率,并在与/没有LGG的生物膜之间进行比较。 Live /Dead®染色用于结构分析。我们的研究结果表明,LGG的RSG无论如何,比1天和3天生物膜的病原体小。病原体的RSRS和恢复率没有显着的差异出现在生物膜与/没有LGG之间的治疗后。据总结,生物膜LGG易于漱口水;但Biofilm LGG既不改变口腔病原体的漱口水效应也不会影响其恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号