首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Children >Primary Transverse Closure Compared to Open Wound Treatment for Primary Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children
【2h】

Primary Transverse Closure Compared to Open Wound Treatment for Primary Pilonidal Sinus Disease in Children

机译:初级横向闭合与初级Pilonidal鼻窦病的开放伤口治疗相比儿童

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to compare the outcome of two different operative methods to correct pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) in children, i.e., excision and open wound care (OW) versus excision and primary transverse closure (PC) of the wound. In this retrospective, observational study, we extracted data from the medical records of 56 patients who underwent surgery for PSD at our institution between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016. To test whether the primary variable, i.e., rate of PSD recurrence, differed between the two surgical groups, a logistic regression model was fitted. Secondary explanatory variables were total length of stay (LOS) at the hospital, complications, sex and age of patients, seniority of the surgeon in charge, and volume of excised specimen. Overall, 32 (57%) children and young adults underwent OW, while 24 (43%) patients were treated by PC. Mean age at operation was 15.5 years in either group. PSD recurred in 12 of 32 (37.5%) children in the OW group and in 3 of 24 (12.5%) children in the PC group (ratio: 0.19, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.03–1.07). Thus, treatment of primary PSD by PC proved superior with respect to PSD recurrence. Moreover, our study did not bring to light any high-grade complications in the PC group, and postoperative pain was minimal. Less invasive treatment approaches for chronic PSD are typically performed in an outpatient setting and offer reduced morbidity, low rates of PSD recurrence, and shortened periods of time to return to work or social activities. More radical operations of PSD should be reserved for recurrent PSD where less invasive approaches have failed several times.
机译:我们旨在比较两种不同操作方法的结果,以纠正儿童的Pilonidal鼻窦病(PSD),即切除和开放的伤口护理(OW)与伤口的切除和初级横向闭合(PC)进行比较。在这项回顾性的观察研究中,我们从2006年1月1日至2016年12月31日之间的机构接受了56名患者的医学记录中提取了56名患者的数据。要测试主要变量,即PSD复发率是否有所不同两个外科手术组,一个逻辑回归模型。中等解释变量是医院,并发症,性别和年龄的患者的总留(LOS),电力外科医生的资历,以及切除的标本的体积。总体而言,32名(57%)儿童和年轻人接受过ow,而24例(43%)患者被PC治疗。两组手术的平均年龄为15.5岁。 PSD在32名(37.5%)中的12个(37.5%)的儿童中,PC组中的24例(12.5%)儿童(比例:0.19,95%置信区间[95%CI] 0.03-1.07)。因此,PC对PSD复发的优越性地处理了原发性PSD。此外,我们的研究并没有引起PC组中任何高档并发症,术后疼痛最小。慢性PSD的侵入性治疗方法较少通常在门诊设定中进行,并提供降低的发病率,降低PSD复发率,缩短了返回工作或社交活动的时间段。 PSD的更多根本操作应保留用于经常性PSD,其中侵入性接近较少的次数失败了几次。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号