首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Home‐based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost‐utility and budget impact analyses
【2h】

Home‐based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost‐utility and budget impact analyses

机译:泰国III阶段结肠癌患者的家庭化疗:成本实用和预算影响分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Home‐based chemotherapy (HC) is a new treatment alternative to hospital‐based chemotherapy treatment (IP) and is administered via portable intravenous pumps at the patient's home. HC reduces the demand for inpatient bed capacity in hospitals and reduces the cost of an infusion. This study takes a societal perspective while conducting the cost‐utility and budget impact analyses (BIA) of HC and IP with an mFOLFOX6 regimen on patients with stage III colon cancer. We conducted a cost‐utility analysis with a 6‐month time horizon. The parameter inputs for the model were gathered from a retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok. The resource usage of HC and IP was determined based on medical records. The per‐unit direct medical, home health service, and adverse events (AE) management costs were gathered from the standard cost list. The health outcome of treatment was measured in terms of quality‐adjusted life years. Disutility related to AE was calculated. We conducted a sensitivity analysis for the uncertainty results and performed BIA based on the societal perspective on a 1‐year time horizon. HC provided a cost‐saving of $1,513.37 per patient for the period of treatment. Thus, assuming 526 patients per year, the use of HC could achieve a cumulative annual cost‐saving of $828,436. HC is a cost‐saving strategy compared to IP for stage III colon cancer treatment. We recommend that the service reimbursement should include national standardization in chemotherapy regimens as well as practice guidelines and protocols to prevent serious AEs.
机译:家庭化疗(HC)是一种新的治疗方法,适用于医院的化疗处理(IP),通过患者家中的便携式静脉内泵进行。 HC降低了医院内部住院床的需求,降低了输注的成本。本研究采用社会观点,同时将HC和IP的成本实用和预算影响分析(BIA)与MFOLFOX6方案进行III阶段结肠癌患者。我们进行了一项经济实用性分析,具有6个月的时间范围。该模型的参数输入是从曼谷Ramathibodi医院诊断患者被诊断患者患者的回顾性队列研究。基于医疗记录确定了HC和IP的资源使用情况。从标准成本清单中收集了每单位直接医疗,家庭健康服务和不良事件(AE)管理费用。治疗的健康结果是根据质量调整的终身来衡量的。计算与AE相关的患者。我们对不确定性结果进行了敏感性分析,并根据社会视角对1年的时间视角进行了比亚。 HC为治疗期提供了每位患者每位患者1,513.37美元的成本节省。因此,假设每年526名患者,使用HC的使用可以达到828,436美元的累计年度节省时间。与IP III阶段结肠癌治疗相比,HC是一种节省成本的策略。我们建议服务报销应包括化疗方案中的国家标准化,以及实践指导方针和议定书,以防止严重AES。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号