首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BJGP Open >Ethnic inclusion in medicine: the ineffectiveness of the ‘Black Asian and Minority Ethnic’ metric to measure progress
【2h】

Ethnic inclusion in medicine: the ineffectiveness of the ‘Black Asian and Minority Ethnic’ metric to measure progress

机译:在医学中的民族包容性:黑色亚洲和少数民族公制的无效措施来衡量进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The medical profession is a success story for ethnic diversity. Approximately 45% of hospital doctors and at least 32% of GPs in the United Kingdom are from minority groups.1,2 Fourteen per cent of the UK population is non-White, with a further 5.5% identifying as a minority White group.3 However, success is marred by problems of ‘inclusion’ of minority ethnic doctors.4 Inclusion is defined as ‘the achievement of a work environment in which all individuals are treated fairly and respectfully, have equal access to opportunities and resources, and can contribute fully to theorganisation’s success.’5 The King’s Fund, a health think-tank, has recently highlighted that senior leadership and managerial positions are predominately held by White British and male persons.6 There has been longstanding discussion regarding inclusion in medicine on the basis of characteristics such as gender and socioeconomic status.7,8 However, the events of 2020 — such as the death of George Floyd, the Black Lives Matter protests, and the impact of COVID-19 on ethnic minority groups — have led to a focus on race and ethnicity.
机译:医学界是民族多样性的成功故事。约有45%的医院医生和英国的至少32%的GPS来自少数民族.1,2英国人口的14%是非白色的,进一步为5.5%,识别为少数白人组然而,成功受到少数民族医生“包含”的问题.4包容被定义为“实现所有个人的工作环境,相当和尊重所有人,都有平等的机会和资源获得,并且可以充分贡献组织成功。'5,国王基金是一家健康智库,最近强调,高级领导和管理职位主要由白英和男性人员持有.6关于在性别和社会经济等特征的基础上纳入医学的长期讨论现状。但是,2020年的事件 - 例如乔治弗洛伊德的死亡,黑人生命抗议以及Covid-19对少数民族群体的影响 - 导致了争夺种族和种族。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号