首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups?
【2h】

Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups?

机译:乳制品是否应该接受虚拟围栏系统作为个人或团体培训?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A virtual fence (VF) system is being evaluated for commercial implementation in the Australian livestock industries. For this to work in dairy systems, cows will require training to learn the association between paired stimuli for livestock containment. We aimed to understand if cow learning and response to VF stimuli would differ when trained as individuals or in groups in a controlled experimental environment. Twenty-three dairy cows were trained to a VF as individuals or in groups of 5–6, and then moved to the alternate context to test the retention of learning. Cows trained in groups were more likely to interact with the VF when tested as individuals, indicating they might rely on the response of their conspecifics rather than directly receiving stimuli themselves. It is important that all individuals learn the association between stimuli to ensure they remain within a boundary, and to minimise potential welfare implications on animals that do not learn. However, training individual cattle is impractical, therefore, further work should evaluate effective group training protocols that provide the time and space for all individuals to learn the VF.
机译:在澳大利亚畜牧业的商业实施中评估虚拟围栏(VF)系统。为此,在乳制品系统中工作,奶牛需要培训,以了解牲畜遏制的成对刺激之间的关联。我们旨在了解COW学习和对VF刺激的响应当被视为个人或受控实验环境中的群体时会有所不同。将二十三头奶牛作为个人或5-6组培训到VF,然后移动到备用背景以测试学习保留。当作为个人测试时,由群体培训的奶牛更有可能与VF进行互动,表明他们可能依赖于他们的消费品的响应而不是直接接受刺激自己。重要的是,所有个人都学习刺激之间的关联,以确保它们仍然存在于边界内,并尽量减少对不学习的动物的潜在福利对。然而,培训单个牛是不切实际的,因此,进一步的工作应评估为所有个人提供学习VF的时间和空间的有效组培训议定书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号