首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Assessment of Mortality and Factors Affecting Outcome of Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Femoropopliteal PAD
【2h】

Assessment of Mortality and Factors Affecting Outcome of Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Femoropopliteal PAD

机译:评估影响使用紫杉醇涂层支架和浅金属支架在股骨头造型垫中使用的结果的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of drug-coated devices in intravascular therapy is aimed at preventing neointimal hyperplasia caused by excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle and thereby restenosis. Although its use seemed initially promising, a recent publication has shown an increased risk of mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices, and there is an urgent need to reaffirm assessments of drug-eluting stents (DES). Objective: The aim of the study was to compare mortality and effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated stents and bare-metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with long-term follow-up. Materials and methods: In a single center randomized study, 256 patients with PAD were treated intravascularly with stent implantation. Patients were randomized into two groups: the first (n = 126) were treated with DES, and the second (n = 130) were treated with BMS. The study included evaluation after the procedure, after about 6 months and 36 months. Co-morbidities, with risks for atherosclerosis, were analyzed in all patients. Patients were evaluated for clinical outcome, restenosis frequency, and safety (complications and total mortality). Results: Clinical benefit at the end of the investigation was statistically significantly better in the DES group compared with the BMS group: 85.7% versus 66.2% ( = 0.0003), respectively. Restenosis occurred significantly less frequently in patients with DES: 16.0% versus BMS: 35.0%, = 0.012. There was no significant effect of comorbidities on the frequency of restenoses. There were no differences in all-cause mortality over the three years with paclitaxel and no-paclitaxel stents cohorts (8.7% versus 7.1%; long-rank = 0.575). No association was found with mortality and treatment with DES or BMS. Conclusions: The use of paclitaxel-coated stents gave good clinical benefit and caused a significantly lower frequency of restenosis compared to bare-metal stents. The use of paclitaxel-coated stents did not increase mortality.
机译:使用药物涂层装置在血管内疗法中的使用旨在预防由血管平滑肌的过度增殖引起的新内膜增生,从而恢复。虽然其使用似乎最初有希望,但最近的出版物表明,与紫杉醇涂层设备的死亡风险增加,迫切需要重申对药物洗脱支架的评估(DES)。目的:该研究的目的是将紫杉醇涂覆的支架和裸金属支架(BMS)的死亡率和有效性进行了治疗周围动脉疾病(垫)的长期随访。材料和方法:在单一中心随机研究中,用支架植入治疗256例含垫患者。患者被随机分为两组:用DES处理第一(n = 126),并用BMS处理第二(n = 130)。该研究包括在手术后的评估,约6个月和36个月后。在所有患者中分析了动脉粥样硬化风险的共同性状。评估患者临床结果,再生率和安全性(并发症和总死亡率)。结果:与BMS组相比,DES组在研究结束时临床益处在DES组中显着更好:85.7%分别与66.2%(= 0.0003)。 DES患者的再狭窄显着频繁发生:16.0%对BMS:35.0%,= 0.012。合并症对重新调整频率没有显着影响。在紫杉醇和无紫杉醇支架队列三年内,全导致死亡率没有差异(8.7%对7.1%;长级= 0.575)。没有接受死亡率和使用DES或BMS治疗的关联。结论:使用紫杉醇涂层支架的使用具有良好的临床益处,并导致与裸金属支架相比的再狭窄频率明显较低。使用紫杉醇涂层支架没有增加死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号