首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Prediction of Static Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete from Dynamic Modulus Associated with Wave Velocity and Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Techniques
【2h】

Prediction of Static Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete from Dynamic Modulus Associated with Wave Velocity and Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Techniques

机译:采用机器学习技术预测与波速和谐振频率相关的动态模量与波速和谐振频率相关的混凝土压缩强度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The static elastic modulus ( ) and compressive strength ( ) are critical properties of concrete. When determining and , concrete cores are collected and subjected to destructive tests. However, destructive tests require certain test permissions and large sample sizes. Hence, it is preferable to predict using the dynamic elastic modulus ( ), through nondestructive evaluations. A resonance frequency test performed according to ASTM C215-14 and a pressure wave (P-wave) measurement conducted according to ASTM C597M-16 are typically used to determine . Recently, developments in transducers have enabled the measurement of a shear wave (S-wave) velocities in concrete. Although various equations have been proposed for estimating and from , their results deviate from experimental values. Thus, it is necessary to obtain a reliable value for accurately predicting and . In this study, values were experimentally obtained from P-wave and S-wave velocities in the longitudinal and transverse modes; and values were predicted using these values through four machine learning (ML) methods: support vector machine, artificial neural networks, ensembles, and linear regression. Using ML, the prediction accuracy of and was improved by 2.5–5% and 7–9%, respectively, compared with the accuracy obtained using classical or normal-regression equations. By combining ML methods, the accuracy of the predicted and was improved by 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively, compared with the optimal single variable results.
机译:静态弹性模量()和抗压强度()是混凝土的关键性质。在确定和时,收集混凝土核心并进行破坏性测试。但是,破坏性测试需要某些测试权限和大型样本尺寸。因此,优选通过非破坏性评估使用动态弹性模量()预测。根据ASTM C215-14进行的共振频率测试和根据ASTM C597M-16进行的压力波(P波)测量通常用于确定。最近,换能器的发展使得能够测量混凝土中的剪切波(S波)速度。尽管已经提出了各种方程来估计和从,但它们的结果偏离了实验值。因此,需要获得可靠的值以准确地预测和。在该研究中,从纵向和横向模式的P波和S波速度实验获得值;使用这些值通过四台机器学习(ml)方法来预测值:支持向量机,人工神经网络,集合和线性回归。与使用经典或正常回归方程获得的准确度相比,使用ML,预测精度分别提高了2.5-5%和7-9%。通过组合ML方法,与最佳单变量结果相比,预测的准确性分别提高了0.5%和1.5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号