首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open >Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
【2h】

Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature

机译:比较独立综合整体整体外科居住模型:文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs.
机译:目前,美国目前有2种批准的居住培训模型赋予美国整体外科检查委员会的资格 - 综合路径和独立途径。虽然这两种途径允许董事会认证,但有很多争论对另一个培训模式的有效性。在本文中,我们审查了现有文献,以比较这些途径,了解学员的质量,毕业生熟练,以及实践或职业结果。强烈鼓励正在进行的研究继续确定两种类型的培训计划的改进领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号