首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
【2h】

Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)

机译:重新评价聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(E 1201)和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(E 1202)作为食品添加剂和使用聚乙烯吡咯烷酮的延伸(E 1201)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, ) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, ) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel followed the conceptual framework under Commission Regulation ( ) No 257/2010 and considered that: the exposure assessment was based on the reported use and use levels (one food category out of the two food categories in which and are authorised); the 95th percentile of exposure to and of maximally 23.7 and 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in children, respectively, was overestimated, because it was assumed that 100% of the food supplements consumed contained or at the maximum reported use levels; the extension of use of (E 1201) to foods for special medical purposes ( 13.2) would result in an exposure of of 4.3 mg/kg bw per day for children; the absorption of and is very low; sufficient toxicity data were available for ; there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of and ; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in rats at a dose of 2,500 mg /kg bw per day, the highest dose tested; there is no need for chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity data for for the safety assessment of given the chemical similarity between and , and the lack of adverse effects in the available repeated dose toxicity studies. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intakes ( s) for and , and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of and as food additives. The Panel further concluded that the proposed extension of use is not expected to be of safety concern at the proposed maximum permitted level ( ) and recommended consumption level.
机译:本文涉及当用作食品添加剂时重新评估聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(E1201,)和聚乙烯醇吡咯烷酮(E 1202)。在本评估中也考虑了在用于特殊医疗的食物中延长使用(E 1201)的一个请求。该小组遵循委员会规定()第257/2010款下的概念框架,并考虑:暴露评估基于报告的使用和使用水平(其中一类食品类别,其中两种食品类别中有授权);儿童每天暴露于和最大为23.7和25mg / kg体重(BW)的95百分位,因为它被认为是100%所含的食品补充剂或最大报告的使用水平;使用(E 1201)的使用对特殊医疗目的的食品(13.2)将导致儿童每天暴露4.3mg / kg BW;吸收和非常低;足够的毒性数据可供选择;关于和遗传毒性并不担心;在每天2,500mg / kg BW的大鼠中致癌物质研究中没有报告致癌物质的致癌作用,最高剂量测试;对于在可用的重复剂量毒性研究中,鉴于具有化学相似性的安全评估,不需要慢性毒性/致癌物质数据。因此,小组得出结论,没有必要对据报道的用途和食品添加剂的使用和使用水平没有任何安全担忧。小组进一步得出结论,拟议的使用延长预计不会在拟议的最大允许水平()和建议的消费水平上对安全问题进行安全问题。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号