首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain Sciences >The Relationship between Emotionally Laden Landmarks Spatial Abilities and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study
【2h】

The Relationship between Emotionally Laden Landmarks Spatial Abilities and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Study

机译:情绪丰富的地标空间能力和人格特征之间的关系:一项探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Separate research lines have shown that the way we process spatial information is influenced by individual factors, such as personality traits and basic spatial abilities. Alongside, recent studies suggest that environmental landmarks can be represented differently depending on their emotional content. However, to our knowledge, no study has addressed so far the issue of whether there is a relationship between individual factors and the way we represent and use spatial information that conveys emotional content. Therefore, this exploratory study aimed to (i) investigate the relationship between personality traits and the use of spatial strategies in relation to emotional stimuli; (ii) investigate if a different pattern emerges according to a body- or object-based spatial encodings. After watching movies of routes characterized by positive, negative, or neutral landmarks, participants performed a “route continuation” (RC, i.e., left/right decision) and a “distance comparison” task (DC, i.e., what was the landmark closest to X?). Furthermore, participants performed a mental rotation task (MR), the Corsi block tapping (CBT), and the Bergen right-left discrimination tests (B-RL). Personality traits were assessed through the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Results showed that a better performance at the RC task was associated with higher scores at CBT tasks in the positive condition and at B-RL test and agreeableness scale from TIPI in both positive and neutral conditions. Instead, the MR task positively correlated with the DC task in all conditions. In sum, individuals’ spatial abilities, personality traits, and task requests influenced the way emotionally laden landmarks were memorized.
机译:分开的研究表明,我们处理空间信息的方式受到个人因素的影响,例如人格特质和基本的空间能力。同时,最近的研究表明,环境地标可以根据其情感内容而有不同的表示。然而,据我们所知,到目前为止,还没有研究解决个体因素与我们表达和使用传达情感内容的空间信息之间是否存在关系的问题。因此,这项探索性研究旨在(i)研究人格特质和与情绪刺激有关的空间策略的使用之间的关系; (ii)根据基于身体或物体的空间编码,研究是否出现了不同的模式。在观看以正,负或中性地标为特征的路线的电影后,参与者执行“路线延续”(RC,即左/右决策)和“距离比较”任务(DC,即最接近地标的路标) X?)。此外,参与者执行了心理旋转任务(MR),Corsi敲击(CBT)和Bergen左右歧视测试(B-RL)。通过十项人格量表(TIPI)评估人格特质。结果表明,RC任务的较好表现与阳性条件下的CBT任务得分较高,以及在正性和中性条件下的B-RL测试以及TIPI的满意程度评分有关。而是,MR任务在所有情况下都与DC任务正相关。总而言之,个人的空间能力,个性特征和任务要求影响了人们对充满情感的地标的记忆方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号