首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic structural and clinical predictors
【2h】

Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic structural and clinical predictors

机译:预测1年随访时精神分裂症症状严重程度的个体改善:结缔组织结构和临床预测指标的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a machine learning setting, this study aims to compare the prognostic utility of connectomic, brain structural, and clinical/demographic predictors of individual change in symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia. Symptom severity at baseline and 1‐year follow‐up was assessed in 30 individuals with a schizophrenia‐spectrum disorder using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Structural and functional neuroimaging was acquired in all individuals at baseline. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict whether individuals improved or worsened with respect to positive, negative, and overall symptom severity. Classifiers were trained using various combinations of predictors, including regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume, static and dynamic resting‐state connectivity, and/or baseline clinical and demographic variables. Relative change in overall symptom severity between baseline and 1‐year follow‐up varied markedly among individuals (interquartile range: 55%). Dynamic resting‐state connectivity measured within the default‐mode network was the most accurate single predictor of change in positive (accuracy: 87%), negative (83%), and overall symptom severity (77%) at follow‐up. Incorporating predictors based on regional cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and baseline clinical variables did not markedly improve prediction accuracy and the prognostic utility of these predictors in isolation was moderate (<70%). Worsening negative symptoms at 1‐year follow‐up were predicted by hyper‐connectivity and hypo‐dynamism within the default‐mode network at baseline assessment, while hypo‐connectivity and hyper‐dynamism predicted worsening positive symptoms. Given the modest sample size investigated, we recommend giving precedence to the relative ranking of the predictors investigated in this study, rather than the prediction accuracy estimates.
机译:在机器学习环境中,本研究旨在比较连接组学,脑结构以及精神分裂症患者症状严重程度个体变化的临床/人口统计学预测指标的预后效用。使用简明精神病评定量表对30例精神分裂症-频谱障碍患者进行了基线和1年随访时的症状严重程度评估。在基线时所有个体均获得了结构和功能性神经影像学。训练机器学习分类器以预测个体在阳性,阴性和总体症状严重性方面是否有所改善或恶化。使用各种预测变量组合来训练分类器,包括区域皮层厚度和灰质体积,静态和动态静止状态连通性,和/或基线临床和人口统计学变量。基线和1年随访之间总体症状严重程度的相对变化因人而异(四分位间距:55%)。在默认模式网络中测得的动态静止状态连通性是随访中阳性(准确性:87%),阴性(83%)和总体症状严重程度(77%)变化的最准确的单个预测因子。基于区域皮层厚度,灰质体积和基线临床变量的预测指标并不能显着提高预测准确性,而孤立地预测这些指标的预后程度中等(<70%)。基线评估时,默认模式网络内的超连通性和动力不足,可预测1年随访时的阴性症状恶化,而低连通性和动力过度可预测阳性症状恶化。考虑到调查的样本量较小,我们建议优先考虑本研究中调查的预测因素的相对排名,而不是预测准确性的估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号