首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes
【2h】

Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes

机译:预期与实际实施之间的差异:疗养院PERS整合的过程评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent studies prove that when implementing new technology technology-driven and one-size-fits-all approaches are problematic. This study focuses on the process of implementing personal emergency response system (PERS) at nursing homes. The aim is to understand why the implementation of PERS has not met initial expectations. Multiple methods were used in two Swedish nursing homes, including document analysis, questionnaires ( = 42), participant observation (67 h), and individual interviews ( = 12). A logic model was used to ascertain the discrepancies that emerged between expected and actual implementation, and the domestication theory was used to discuss the underlying meanings of the discrepancies. The discrepancies primarily focused on staff competence, system readiness, work routines, and implementation duration. Corresponding reasons were largely relevant to management issues regarding training, the procurement systems, individual and collective responsibilities as well as invisible work. The uptake of technology in daily practice is far more nuanced than a technology implementation plan might imply. We point out the importance of preparing for implementation, adjusting to new practices, and leaving space and time for facilitating implementation. The findings will be of use to implementers, service providers, and organizational managers to evaluate various measures in the implementation process, enabling them to perform technology implementation faster and more efficiently.
机译:最近的研究证明,在实施新技术时,技术驱动和千篇一律的方法都是有问题的。这项研究的重点是在疗养院实施个人应急系统(PERS)的过程。目的是了解为什么PERS的实施未达到最初的期望。瑞典的两个疗养院采用了多种方法,包括文件分析,问卷调查(= 42),参与者观察(67 h)和个人访谈(= 12)。使用逻辑模型确定预期和实际实施之间出现的差异,并使用归化理论讨论差异的潜在含义。差异主要集中在员工能力,系统准备情况,工作例程和实施时间上。相应的原因与培训,采购系统,个人和集体责任以及无形工作等管理问题有关。日常实践中采用的技术比技术实施计划所暗示的要细微得多。我们指出了为实施做准备,适应新做法并为促进实施留出空间和时间的重要性。这些发现将对实施者,服务提供商和组织经理有用,以评估实施过程中的各种措施,从而使他们能够更快,更有效地执行技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号