首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecules >A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
【2h】

A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media

机译:定量从相关生物介质中NO释放物质中释放一氧化氮的不同方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The development of solid materials that deliver nitric oxide (NO) are of interest for several therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, due to NO’s reactive nature, rapid diffusion and short half-life, reporting their NO delivery characteristics is rather complex. The full knowledge of this parameter is fundamental to discuss the therapeutic utility of these materials, and thus, the NO quantification strategy must be carefully considered according to the NO-releasing scaffold type, to the expected NO-releasing amounts and to the medium of quantification. In this work, we explore and discuss three different ways of quantifying the release of NO in different biological fluids: haemoglobin assay, Griess assay and NO electrochemical detection. For these measurements, different porous materials, namely zeolites and titanosilicates were used as models for NO-releasing platforms. The oxyhaemoglobin assay offers great sensitivity (nanomolar levels), but it is only possible to monitor the NO release while oxyhaemoglobin is not fully converted. On the other hand, Griess assay has low sensitivity in complex biological media, namely in blood, and interferences with media make NO measurements questionable. Nevertheless, this method can measure micromolar amounts of NO and may be useful for an initial screening for long-term release performance. The electrochemical sensor enabled real-time measurements in a variety of biological settings. However, measured NO is critically low in oxygenated and complex media, giving transient signals, which makes long-term quantification impossible. Despite the disadvantages of each method, the combination of all the results provided a more comprehensive NO release profile for these materials, which will help to determine which formulations are most promising for specific therapeutic applications. This study highlights the importance of using appropriate NO quantification tools to provide accurate reports.
机译:输送一氧化氮(NO)的固体材料的开发对于几种治疗应用很重要。然而,由于NO的反应性,快速扩散和短的半衰期,因此报告其NO的输送特性相当复杂。对该参数的充分了解是讨论这些材料的治疗用途的基础,因此,必须根据释放NO的支架类型,预期的释放NO的量和量化的介质,仔细考虑NO的定量策略。 。在这项工作中,我们探索和讨论了量化不同生物液中NO释放的三种不同方式:血红蛋白测定,Griess测定和NO电化学检测。对于这些测量,使用不同的多孔材料,即沸石和钛硅酸盐作为释放NO平台的模型。氧合血红蛋白测定法具有很高的灵敏度(纳摩尔水平),但是只有在氧合血红蛋白未完全转化时才可以监测NO的释放。另一方面,Griess测定法在复杂的生物介质(即血液)中灵敏度较低,并且对介质的干扰使NO测量难以置信。然而,该方法可以测量微摩尔量的NO,对于长期释放性能的初步筛选可能有用。电化学传感器可以在各种生物学环境中进行实时测量。但是,在含氧和复杂的介质中,测得的NO极低,会产生瞬态信号,因此无法进行长期定量。尽管每种方法都有缺点,所有结果的组合为这些材料提供了更全面的NO释放曲线,这将有助于确定哪种制剂最适合特定的治疗应用。这项研究强调了使用适当的NO定量工具提供准确报告的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号